Actually I've bought the 1/100 and MG as well, if just talk about overal scale, I would bit prefer 1/100 more as I feel that MG bit too tall (just personal preference).
That's y when the news of MG release at the early stage, I don't plan to buy that!! (although finally still bought the ver. with lamp inside!! )
However if talk about details...........and assembly way, of course MG much better!!
nick:) 2009-10-20 15:13
HEAT2009-11-04 01:35
Billy 2009-10-16 10:51
Sorry Sorry! just joking! Don't be serious!!
Actually I've bought the 1/100 and MG as well, if just talk about overal scale, I would bit prefer 1/100 more as I feel that MG bit too tall (just personal preference).
That's y when the news of MG release at the early stage, I don't plan to buy that!! (although finally still bought the ver. with lamp inside!!
)
However if talk about details...........and assembly way, of course MG much better!!
HEAT2009-10-17 03:50
Billy 2009-10-16 07:55
HEAT2009-10-16 10:28
用乜標準衡量??
同埋MG o既整體上比1:100唔止好上double 咁少lor
Hathaway 2009-10-15 14:50
HEAT2009-10-16 04:31
【喜樂 的森】 2009-10-15 11:51
改咗好睇好多，不過舊1:100的頭偏小，MG的較合比例! 我試過將MG頭插落舊1:100度即刻靚晒! 條頸好似幼咗D
12月出SD Real-Type高達連G戰機，真的假的?
CLICK TO ENTER
HEAT2009-10-16 04:32
永遠笑的蕉 2009-10-14 19:48
好作品
HEAT2009-10-16 04:33
Billy 2009-10-13 09:48
HEAT2009-10-16 04:33