你好,歡迎到訪My Blog!請指教 Welcome your comments

我的心情

關閉

我的心情

由 2010-02-10 至 2010-02-10

網誌清單

編輯 關閉

 

Introduction

Why you need to understand Universe before you can find out the mission of Lives and Human beings?  (To guide you to understand why most religious theories are probably wrong, but the core values are true. You may regret for not reading it or not being able to understand it)

Lives have only existed on the Earth planet for about 2 billion years, and human beings only about 2.9 million years while primates for about 8 to 3 million years. Earth or the Solar system has existed for about 4.5 billion years,but the spacetime universe for about 13.7 billion years.

All these figures tell us that Universe does not exist for us but we might exist for the universe.

If we exist for the universe, then there must be a mission (effect) and we must exist for a reason (cause)that is associated with nothing but the spacetime Universe. Suppose we are here for solving a problem , do you think that human beings are strong enough to do that? Of course not, we are so minute. So we must be here to do some kind of  research studies and would hand our research findings to some other party (by then human beings would have all vanished) to carry out the problem solving  in future. These approaches all make sense. Don't they?

Though we human beings are minute, we are the most intelligent animals on the planet and perhaps in the spacetime universe (dinosours were not clever enough to do the job, so they were extinguished to give way to primates. Yet monkeys are not smart enough, so some were modified to become humans) and we are the only lives that can study and appreciate the wonders of the universe.

Look all above are meaningless if we believe that Unvierse and Lives are creations of a God or Gods because it is fruitless for a created item (we) to study other created items. Next we would focus on what problems the universe might have that require the intelligence of human beings.

Those who are familiar with cosmology know that there are many unsolved problems with the current spacetime universe. Flatness problem, Horizon problem, Structure problem, Singularity problem, Expansion mode problem, entropy problem, matter & anti-matter assymmetry, co-incidence  just to name a few. Big Bang Theory and Inflation theories and General Relativity Theory (theories) attempt to answer some but they are not very successful because they cannot explain

a. how space and time were born? b. how lives were created? c. how particles gained mass?(the so called Higgs boson or God particle has not yet been discovered) ?, d.how to balance the energy account in this universe (e.g. how much  is there the dark matters and  dark energy )?

All these problems in fact can boil down to just one: Why is the spacetime universe ever expanding and did it ever stop expanding in the past?

To continue the search, let us assume there exists such a Mission, without which there is no need to carry on with the search.

From now on we assume that there is an intrinsic Mission . So lives (for the sake of the Mission) started to evolve on the planet some 2-4 billion years ago. They started as simple lives, then multi-cell lives and then more complex lives such as Dinasours that ruled the planet for about 0.15 billion years until they suddenly all died some 70 million years ago.

There are several theories about the sudden extinction of dinasours, but none can explain beyond doubt why there were so many dinasour eggs left unhatched. Then how the life evolution took a sharp turn : not to produce dinasours but primates which appeared some  8-3 millions years ago, and then the perfect version of intelligent primates Mankind which from then on have ruled the planet.

Of course I have my own explanation for these but I would for time being keep it close to my chest. Now we have a Mission Theory and we embark on the journey of finding

a. what that mission is, and

b. what relation it has with religions and science.

Let us deal with the "b" part first, because the "a"part is rather deep and profound and demands a lot of knowledge in Physics and Cosmology.

Let us first ask a question:-

If spacetime universe was born 13.7 billion years ago, why was there no universe before that time? Scientists cannot answer this question. Religionists tend to put forward some answers which they are not entitled to give, because they were never informed by God or devines .Those answers were perhaps written down in some religious documents  ( yet they were all man-made documents since you could not expect God to hold up a pen and write down the words). The only religious answer : God created the Universe (but no mention about what happened before the Creation). Now it is to be discussed.

If we call Almighty God a Powerful Engergy, then He should take up spacetime (according to Einstein's GR), but this would be contradictory to "no spacetime before the Creation".So God if He exists, can only be a Spiritual body. Yet He is said to have eyes, face, nose, ears as a human and He even brew air into his made human Adam.  So either the first (energy)or the second  (spirit) statement is correct , but not both.

The only possible and sensible statement about God based on above argument is: God is a spiritual body taking up no spacetime. So we may conclude that before the birth of the spacetime universe, there existed at least a spiritual universe and there could be more than 1 spiritual body..

Then since God has a symmetrical anatomy (eyes, nostrils, ears etc), some symmetry must have existed then. So it is not too wrong to assume that spiritual universes existed in pairs.

We may even then proceed to assume that there were many spiritual bodies as inhabitants in those pairs of spiritual universes. In that case there is no reason to assume that a particular spiritual inhabitant was unique, privileged, and  Almighty. All spiritual inhabitants should be and were of equal status .

For the sake of book-keeping, all spiritual universes and inhabitants must be of algebraic sum zero. That is, we should have at least a spiritual universe with spirits  plus an anti-spiritual universe with anti-spirits. They if added up give a Zero in all respect. This is the idea of Zeroism零道. Zeroism is actually an extract from the famous Taoist Thought道家思想 ( I would not use the word Taoism which is the religion and not the thought itself). In essence, Zeroism is the law of evolution of anything including the spiritual universes . It consists of 4 basic laws

i) Everything is born out of nothing 無中生有,( I would not use 無極生太極 for some reason to be discussed later). This  can be expressed mathematically by an example

  0= -3 +3-18+18....

The left hand side is Zero, nothing, the right hand side shows pairs of values that add up to zero

This is the Creation Law

ii)All things add up algebraically  to zero,萬有歸無. This is apparant from above example.

This is the Destruction Law

iii)law i and law ii are equal and opposite, i.e. at the end of the evolution, it will be back to the start, or back to square one, it is the Evolution law

週而復始

iv) the above 3 laws repeat and repeat, it is a cyclic law,循環不息。 We call it the Maintenance Law

To differentiate Zeroism from Taoism or Taoist Thoughts (you would note the difference in future), I coin the term Zeroism (零道).

We can see from the Creation Law: that things are born out of nothing in pairs, and that from the Destruction law, that things are destroyed in pairs. Suppose -3 and +3 go in pair into the "Vanish Room", they pair and vanish (zero), then next -18 and +18 enter and pair and vanish and so on.

If however the sequential order is disturbed so that -3 and -18 pair and get into the Vanish Room. They do not vanish, and this prevents the entering of +3 and +18 and the others. This would have a long lasting effect!

That is what happened to our pair of opposite spiritual universes . The inhabitants and universes did not pair in the right pace and tempo, and a Spacetime universe (instead of a new spiritual universe pair)was born .In theory an anti-universe was born at the same time. It was an incident or accident. How it happened? Where is that anti-universe now?  I would leave it for later discussion when I discuss the Big Impact Theory大撞擊論 (replacing the Big Bang Theory大爆炸論).

Hence we know that the spacetime universe was not created but caused by an accident.

This is like two tour buses crashing head-on. Some passengers escaped unhurt, some are trapped in the wreckage. We can say that the drivers are responsible for the wreckage but not that they are the Creator of the wreckage (the spacetime universe). As they are not the intentional creator, they are not Almighty nor they have the power to punish or reward other mortals and immortals. In fact they as spirits have no means to intervene with things in the spacetime universe which are filled with energies and matters that are made up of twisted and trapped spirits.

If they want to intervene with the spacetime, they need to get into spacetime matters and reincarnate as lives. So a Forward can kick the ball into the goal but not a spirit can send the ball into the goal. Knowing this, it would be useless to pray to God or other divines and beg for blessing and protection. None of them can answer the prayer.

Now those unhurt passengers are contriving ways to save the trapped spirits. This is what is all about human beings and other live forms. At the moment there are no concrete ways to salvage all this spacetime universe and liberate the trapped spirits though there are some hypotheses(which are hinted in various religions, we shall discuss these later)..

Whether the workable ways can be contrived is  anybody's guess, not even those free spirits know.

So the future is uncertain, and there is no Fate 命運or Fated Encounters緣. You can from now on know that Fortune Telling is nothing but guesswork. This can be further generalised to refute those religious doctrines  which allege that the fate of human beings are  sealed. If the fate is known and pre-determined, then what is the purpose of soldiering along the human lives?

To be fair , let us turn also to Buddhism and disapprove the existence of Buddahs. Most educated buddists agree that Buddhism is not a religion but a philosophy, yet they cannot tell the difference and they still accept that there are omnipotent beings known as Buddhas. If that is a philosophy and Buddha is a being that has discovered the ultimate truth (which is not defined), then other mortals and immortals need not follow suit to do the discovery.  Sir Issac Newton discovered the 3 laws of motion, other engineers need not  follow Newton to discover once again such laws, they only need to apply these laws in daily life, in machinery ,and other mechanical systems. Similarly Columbus discovered America, then not everybody needs to go there before he/she is convinced that there is such a continent called America. So it must be wrong or unnecessary to expect everyone to become a buddah.

Other questions that disapprove Buddhas are

a. Did buddhas exist before human beings? (If so, how long ago? Then why should we  have human beings and not just buddhas? If not, then who installed the system of Karma ? If not, then by cultivation修為, all human beings can become one day Buddhas, what further job would the buddhas have then?)

b. If Buddhas are cultivated versions of souls of human beings (this makes sense), then the job must not stop there. There must be a New Mission for all these Buddhas. What is that New Mission?

c.According to Karma(果報), souls are of 6 levels, the lowest being Hungry Ghosts. If a person did not behave well, then after death, his/her soul would be punished and demoted to a lower level and reincarnation as perhaps an animal such as a pig and face being slaughtered. Let us say at around BC2500 when Buddha Shakyamuni釋加牟尼 was preaching Buddhism, the world population was 0.2 billion. If Karma worked, today's population should be smaller (as we have more bad people than before. Bad people died and became animals and not human), but we have now 6.5 billion instead. So we can conclude Karma is only a wishful thinking, not true at least as an ultimate punishment or reward system.

d.If Buddhism is right and powerful  as a religion, then suppose all men and women are converted into buddhist monks and nuns (a big achievement!), then in a few tens of years, after the death of these monks and nuns, the lineage of human beings would stop and there would be no human beings (buddhist monks and nuns are celibate).  Do you think that Monks and Nuns can become buddhas only after a few tens of years of cultivation修為? Of course not, then cultivation process would stop there and there is no hope to get more buddhas. You may argue that not everybody would be a monk or nun so that scenario never happens. Yes, that would never happen, but if it never happens, what would be the purpose of those hard works of buddhas? So the religion is inconsistent, on one hand it wants every soul to become buddha and yet on the other hand it knows that it would never happen. Even if one day all souls become buddhas , then there will be no further things to do. It would be boring to become a buddha!

Now we can use similar arguments to disapprove those heavenly beings神仙 in Taoism. There is no such a governing system in Heaven under which all eco systems and bio systems on the Globe and in Heaven are run, because there is not such a divine being or God that can assign duties and powers to others.

Don't get me wrong that I totally reject the existence of God, Buddhas, and heavenly beings.

In fact, under the Mission Theory, the above figures are allowed, but subject to some different interpretation and under certain conditions. For example, we may call that group of free spirits(unhurt passengers) that contributed by efforts to lay the Galaxy Forming foundations ,as God. Without galaxies in the the spacetime universe, lives could not have evolved

Buddhas though are not here yet , are in gestation. Those of us who succeed by repeated  and continuous cultivations in this world may be able to harvest a very cultivated soul after the human phase (gone in about 100 years  in view of the global warming. For this reason we need to protect environment so that we can buy more time for our Mission. Everyone should from today on be environmentally friendly, not for your offsprings, but for the Mission) and may be qualified to carry out the entrusted work of Carrying out the Plan (the Repayment of Debt, which we shall discuss later). These souls can be called Buddhas (The Future Buddhas三世佛中的將來佛, foretold by Buddhism as Maitreya Bodhisattva彌勒佛 or Bhaisajya Guru 藥師佛. Incidentally, one may at liberty equate the Almighty God to the past buddah group過去佛, and Human beings to the Contemporary buddha group如來佛. Afterall these names are a matter of  nomenclature)

So we have reached an important conclusion: That under the Mission Theory (if and only if human beings are born for a Mission), then human beings must wake up to understand that Mission, study it and find ways to go towards it. Their fate is not sealed, they are on their own, no other supernatural powers can protect or bless or punish them.

Would that send a wrong message to all : that you can do whatever you like, immoral or illegal and no one is to punish you except your rivals or human laws? No, there is a certain reward and punishment system but that is not by others (such as Karma)but comes from your own soul. I would explain this more in details.

But let us first gag those who argue that God or Creators still exist despite the Mission theory.

If Gods or Creators exist, they must be spiritual bodies and I would ask "Where in the spacetime universe can they exist?". If the argument is that Creator or God exists everywhere in the universe , that means God is filling the universe spacetime. Now that the spacetime is known to expand non-stop , God's body is expanding too. The expansion would mean God's spiritual power is being diluted until he no longer could exercise the spiritual power. So do you think that God would allow His body expand infinitely and what for? Perhaps such expansion is beyond his control, if so, that means he is not almighty. In fact that subject is a paradox in the science circle. It is believed by some scientists that it is the Dark Energy (not evil energy) that drives the spacetime universe expansion, yet it is inexplicable why it is not diluted in terms of energy density. The other thing is that if God is staying in spacetime universe, His state must be a function of co-ordinate time at least. But this is against the general acceptance that spiritual bodies are not affected by time.

I do not think that those who support the existence of God can answer these questions. If they cannot provide a sensible answer, they should give up their insistence until they find new evidence.

Of course I would give my  explanation later (after the introduction of Big Impact Theory which is rather complicated ), but for now I have cleared all the religious blocks that hinder our journey.

But there are still those fallacies that come from Taoist thoughts 道家思想and scientists. Let us deal with the Taoist thoughts first. While it is right to say that Dao 道 (which is not well defined in the context of Taoist Thoughts) has existed as the ultimate mechanism for everything in the universe, no one has ever succeeded to pin point  Dao to anything physical or that can be appreciated without guesswork. Some equate it to Nature, and say that human beings should live following the way of Nature . Some equate human body to a mini universe or part of the nature and from then on invent a lot of theories that lack scientific support, such as Qi (氣) that is said to permeate human bodies. The change of Qi or movement of Qi is  said to be controllable and can be manipulated to communicate with Universe and result in longevity if not immortality. Yet you do not see anyone immortal so far though there are a lot of legends and myths.. I shall give  a different explanation for Qi later.

If we review the history of Universe, Human beings have never been part of Nature. Nature has no definition until and unless we recede to the time when the spacetime Universe was about to be born or was just born. Earth and the solar system have only existed for about 5 billion years. Would it be ridiculous to say that there was no Nature 5 billion years ago? Why human can consider themselves as part of the Nature and can follow the natural way to live? What does the Nature ask mankind to do ? With so many uncertainties and unclear definitions , no wonder Dao is not well defined, not mentioned the role of human beings in this universe. It can be concluded that those who assume that they know Dao and tell people how to lead lives are actually not capable of the task. Upon their death, there are nothing of them worth reading nor pursuit. Of course they only proved that they had pursued Dao in the wrong way  and we must warn ourselves not to be fooled by the  fallacies and wrong  theories. We should seek truth by a more scientific and logical way.  Zhuang Tze 莊子(typical representative of Taoist Thought) raised a number of philosophical points and showed us how to view things objectively without using biased human judgement( to distinguish good/bad, alive/dead, happy/sad things). Yet he was on the wrong footing (viewing from spacetime universe instead of Zeroism). At the end he even discouraged people from studying and finding facts (吾生也有涯...)as in his opinion all efforts would be fruitless ( though some scholars say these are fabricated works by others). Do you think you can complete the Mission by going that way?

In general Toaists because of the wrong footing, cannot give a good derivation of Zero,無. The so called 無 or無極 (true zero), does not represent the true zero. The spacetime universe is only a half of the universe pair born under  perturbed Zeroism. So within the spacetime universe, there can never be any true zero or true vacuum. The physicists also make the same mistake (here it is the most wrong theory or fallacy from the scientists.) when they equate the total energy in the spacetime universe  to zero, i.e. K.E equal and opposite to P.E.  It would be equally wrong to assume an inflation theory based on false vacuum rolling down to true vacuum (incidentally, Big Impact theory rules out the Higgs Boson's role and existence)

At this juncture, I would like to point out why Zhuang Tze and other Toaists could not give a correct picture about Dao.  To do this, let us define what Dao is.

Dao has existed before Human beings, before the solar system, before Milkway galaxy, before the spacetime universe. This is the natural answer and no other choice. So the only choice is that Dao is Zeroism, the laws of spiritual universes creation/evolution/destruction. This is exactly what Lao Tze 老子 referred to when he wrote 道可道,非恆道。恆道, the eternal mechanism is Zeorism. But most Taoists including Zhuang Tze wrongly interpreted it and considered that the eternal mechanism is part of the spacetime universe, not knowing that it has been replaced by the Describable mechanism (可道之道) which now governs the evolution of the spacetime universe.

Because of the wrong footing in Taoist thoughts, wrong perceptions in Yin Yang 陰陽 and many other associated wrong derivatives come into being. The most common mistake is the Taiji picture(Taiji Tu 太極圖)。Incidentally, Yin Yang was incorporated into Taoism or Taoist Thoughts at a later stage, and was not anything indigenous. The said  black and white picture is used to explain all the phenomena in the universe, ranging from human behaviors, evolution of matters, seasons, days/nights, human bodies, and even universe construction. The symmetry of the picture (black and white ) asserts a universal symmetry everywhere. For me, I am only concerned if the picture can tell anything about universe or physics. It has been known , however that spacetime Universe does not observe symmetry (e.g. parity violation, For this discovery, Dr. C.N.Yang shared the Nobel Price with Dr.T.D Lee in 1957). Then comes the matter-anti- matter asymmetry.The general wrong notion is that Yin and Yang are equal and opposite. If true, they would add up to algebraically zero. In physics, this is not the case either. Though some physicists believed or believe  that anti-matters and matters would add up to zero, it is known that is not the case. Take a positron (anti-particle of electron,.as massive as electron) and an electron for example, they pair to give a pair of Gamma photons (massless)and not Zero. Other assymmetries include  among others ChargeParity, barionic and non baryonic matter, and it is still not certain whether CPT is absolutely conserved.

At this point, it is appropiate to review the concept of energy convervation . This is very basic and is considered true universally throughout the history of the spacetime universe at least up to the Planck's time. The Big Bang theory suggested that energy (extremely hot)came out from a singularity point where energy density was infinitely high and from then on this amount of energy has been conserved. Yet there is no way to tell how this energy could have been generated. So there must have been an unknown mechanism ( but answered in the Big Impact Theory) to pump in this energy and there must be a violation of conservation of energy sometime before Planck's time (i.e. energy being pumped in). Another consideration that we should take is the non-stop expansion of the spacetime universe. Spacetime requires existence of energy and vice versa, that means the energy in the spacetime universe is expanding or increasing. A violation of the law of conservation of Energy? (answer can be found in the Big Impact Theory to be introduced)

Particles and matters are variants of energy. So if physics were the only laws governing the spacetime universe, then all the particles in this spacetime universe should have been moving and envolving completely under the dictation of physics (of course laws of physics also evolve). In other words, if there was an Omnipotent observer not belonging to this spacetime, he could have predicted all the futures of particles or the fate of the  whole spacetime universe by using laws of physics. But this is contradictory to the observations. Firstly, we have some peculiar matters existing in this spacetime, at least on this planet. These organic matters group themselves up to become various life forms. They are able to some extent defy law of physics. There is not any law in physics that supports the evolution of these organic matters. The evolution of lives followed more or less Dawin's model but with the spirits playing the most important part (so as to answer why complicated DNA and genome can be built in such relatively short time scale of universe of 13.7 billion years, and why  a species not only could survive but could also reproduce its lineage. If physics governed lives, then the lives should be like bubbles emerging from a pool of water agitated by a whisk. The bubbles would emerge and collapse but should not be able to reproduce themselves)

Secondly imagine, during an earthquake, a mudslide sends a boulder rolling down the hill and it rams a hut where a man is inside. Physics predict that the hut would be crushed but not the fate of the man. Whether he would be killed depends on his agility . So there is something else other than physics and particles ,that is at play. Though the scientists deny the existence of spirits, spirits are there as advocated by all religions . The spirits form the soul of a man and his body. The spirits through their presence inside a human body can make that massive assembly move and act in a way appropiate to their desires. It is because of the spirits interacting with the particles of the spacetime that we do not have a certain or dictated future called fate( the worldline or worldtube of a tree cannot tell whether it is dead or alive).

Here we have come to a stand-off between religions and physics. On one hand scientists insist on Materialism. On the other hand, most religions advocate Immaterialism. To me, both approaches are wrong (but not totally wrong). I would favour a middle ground, similar to Dualism. I feel no qualm to say that it is the arrogance of scientists that has halted the progress of cosmology and physics in revealing the secrets of universe. If they had accepted spirits co-existing with spacetime universe, it would not have been too difficult to find that  in fact all particles and convertible energies are entrapped spirits (two types of spirits entangled and glued together), and that those organic matters known as lives are simply particles grouped and linked and interlinked in a certain pattern by free spirits. An organic cell without the free spirit becomes a dead cell. This co-existence can explain the String theory too . As for the religions, while they have told some true facts, unfortunately they were told in a manner so subtle that almost all  believers are misled to believe in some sort of supernatural powers. As such, the religions over-simplify the duties of human  . Instead of engaging in studying  the physics and cosmos by observation and calculations, they take things for granted, and they stick for years to the  same bibles and the like and use meditation, or Zen, or prayers to cultivate themselves. The religious people consider basically that studying universe and physics are not necessary. The most important thing is to please God or Devines and be promised a passport to Heaven. Don't you think that it is a kind of Greed and favor currying,which  they are taught not to have or to do? As a result they are ignorant about what mechanism is driving the universe expansion and how elementary particles are in action. Do you think they can relate human lives or all living creatures to universe correctly in any respect? Without understanding what are really in action and at play, how can you set your role correctly in this spacetime universe? It is talking gibberish if a certain religion tells you how to act properly to appease god and be appropiate to nature. A certain group of Christians even go to the extreme to deny totally the observable universe and claim that universe has existed for only about 6000 years. They claim that it is Satan who fools the scientists with a charade of life evolution and universe evolution. If they were correct, it would sound that Satan was more creative and powerful than Almighty God. Why God would have allowed Satan to be so creative and powerful? Perhaps God can no longer outplay Satan? Of course this is not the unanimous view of all Christians and hence answers to such questions might not be necessary. I cannot accept such total denial of physics and scientific findings.  ( I must reiterate  the above analysis is based on the premise that Human beings are born with a Mission).

Another fallacy that Religions bring in is Love. Certain religions emphasise Love: by loving your enemies, you end up to have no enemies and the world becomes peaceful. But if that was true, there would not have been so many warfares. The Middle East is still at war, ironically is around the place where Jesus Christ was born.  Love is good, but while we have love, we have Hatred too, the conjugate and opposite of Love. It is this hatred that is dominating the world now. Religions are supposed to unite people, but they end up splitting ( because of the hatred along with love)people into various religious groups which then developed into different sects, gangs; some being social groups, some political and extremist groups. In essence, Love has been abused and exploited. At times, people get confused with all kinds of love:  brotherhood, filialation, paternity , sexsual affection, friendship, and afiliation.  So there are cases where a brother has sex with his sister, a kid with his mother, a priest with the alter boy, a teacher with a student, a man with a man, a female with a female, adultery, and promiscuity.

All the above abnormal sexes or relatations started from some kind of "feeling good " by being close to the other party. If we do not use the word Love,  perhaps we can say we are Kind to our brothers, sisters, friends; we are Filial to our parants, we Respect our teachers and seniors.The word Love should be limited to Male and Female relationship (e.g. husband and wife)only. Love features strong affinity, possession, and selfishness. I Love my wife (or girl friend), I Hate other men to love her and I Hate to see that she loves another man .  I respect my parants, I welcome other people to respect my parents too. So you see Love goes alongside with Hate. The selfishness and possession of Love is inscribed in the Chinese charactor 愛 (love).The top part is 爪 (claw) while the central part is 心 (heart).  In the earthquake that hit Szechuan ,China last May (2008), many Chinese were killed and injured. I did not know these victims, but I felt sorry for them and I was moved when I saw their faces on TV. This is not because of love. I admitted I had no love for them. Love is a transitive term, you need a definite object before you can attach love . The victims and refugees do not belong to a definite object (lacking names ,identities,intimacy, historic mutual  interaction). I was  just sympathetic and empathetic with these unlucky people (regardless of whether they are my compatriots or not).

In Buddhism, love is not mentioned, rather Mercy(慈悲) is always emphasised. Mercy is different from kindness. As human beings, we have mercy upon those in troubles. Usually we would not be proactive to offer our assistence since it is not possible to care about so many troubles. Yet when these victims come to us and beg for help, we should do what we can. Of course at the level of spiritual buddhas (which have not existed yet according to Mission Theory), they should answer prayers reasonably. This approach seems a bit passive and does not help to unite people strongly.

In confuscianism, Kindness 仁 is the way we should treat people other than parents  (where we have filial duties孝), brothers (where we have brotherhood, 悌),  sexual partners (where we have heterosexual intimacy,love愛), and children (where we have bloodline lineage and kinship嫡). Yet all these relations should be monitored and censured by Justice (義) and Propriety (禮)。These sound good and should work until we have perturbation from greed and selfishness which create injustice , favorism, and hatred.

Then what about Zeroism? In the eyes of a Zeroist, all lives in the Universe are for a mission. Some are secondary and some belong to the Major force. Human beings form the unique force in accomplishing that mission direct. So all human beings are team members with one common goal. With that mindset, every human being is a team member of this big team. Team members should develop a team spirit, and they should support each other and stay harmonious. Thus nothing is more important  than the Mission. You can forget  politics, military strategies, economics, culture policies....such man-made issues. We are here to solve a problem which has existed a priori and not to create problems ourselves and then spend all time in dealing with these man-made problems. "Teamhood" (no such word in dictionary) should be the feeling to replace all sorts of affections. We need nothing else other than Division of Labour. That is, people who are smart in mental work should be entrusted with the work of revealing the secrets of  universe and figuring out what to do next and finally. Others should work to support these relatively brilliant people. So should the other live forms(e.g. poutry serve us with meat). This is like a soccer team of which the field members play the game direct while the backup is provided by other members who do all the chores of washing, cooking, etc. This is the only and ultimate solution to all human problems. You  now know why capitalism, socialism, communism and other ideologies and theologies do not work at all as they are far from the Mission and they only focus on the human problems. You need not do anything yet you solve all human problems and that is the core meaning of 無而治 (do nothing and get things managed) of Taoist Thoughts.

Having said so much about the Mission Theory, it is worth to study it from another angle. Using reverse logic, we assume that Mission Theory is wrong, and it is correct to have an Almighty God  create all things in the universe including spirits and human beings. Now we would like to have answers to the following questions:-

a. Why did God create Adam and Eva not obeying His order? He made similar mistake before by creating a rebellious angel Satan. Why did He not learn the lesson ?

b. Why did God not correct his mistake in the early creations by wiping out Satan or wiping our Adam and Eva?

c. Why did God put Curiosity and not Obedience in Human nature? Without that curiosity, Eva would not have been tempted by that Serpant Satan.

d. All people would believe in God if they know His real existence and would be obedient to Him. The reason that people do not believe Him is that there is no way to tell if He really exists. Yet even Satan knows His exsistence, Satan still turns the back on Him. God should know then that without telling people His real existence , it would be difficult to make them believe Him. The simplest way is therefore to have God appear before the whole world. But He chooses not to do so , why? The same question is asked for  not seeing Satan's apparition.

e.Yet God took the trouble of dividing Himself into 2 parts and let one part be incarnated as Jesus Christ (not all similar religions accept that) to go through all the human sufferings and then be crucified by the Romans (motivated obviously by Satan) so as to pay for sins committed by human beings and so as to beg forgiveness from the other heavenly half.. All these sound very weird if not irrational. Yet despite what Jesus has done, the world is still in a vortex of troubles and sins. It seems God did not calculate well before putting the plan in action. He is not that Almighty?

c. God teaches us to love everyone. Yet He was extremely brutal when He decided to kill all human beings and lives on the globe except those on Noah's Ark.  He has anger and hatred similar to a human being , one of his created items. He therefore has set a bad example. Yet He blames only His creations and not Himself.  Why?

d. God promises us a place in Heaven if we praise and obey Him. God would send us to Hell if we do not. This is a stick-and -carrot policy well copied by today's politicians. But politics are infamous for the dirty tricks. Again God has taught us something bad. Why?

e. In point a, we mention that God has created Satan. We have a case where a spirit creates another spirit. Yet for Jesus, he is part of God. Why did not God create Jesus?  In fact can spirits be created or destroyed?  Logically, if God can create a soul, He can destroy a soul. But why did He not punish those bad souls by destroying them? Perhaps He cannot destroy the spirits? A man and a woman can also give birth of a child having a spirit (soul). Do human beings in that sense possess the similar power of creating spirits?

f. It is said that God loves everyone on the globe as long as he/she follows the way He likes , yet many infants and children (who did not commit any crime or sin) died in accidents, miscarriages, epidemics, femine, wars, and other disasters, and it happens everyday in huge number.How would you account for such "loving acts"?

g. Why all dinosours died? If they were creations, why God disliked them?

There could be many answers to above questions, but all these answers would not make sense since these would be man-made answers. Yet there exists a possible and sensible answer: since these questions cannot be answered logically and consistently, the a priori assumption must be wrong. That means there is no creator of the spacetime universe including its contents.

 So you are faced with 2 choices: Human beings are born with a Mission (whatever that mission is) or Human beings happen to be on the planet by chance. If you advocate the latter choice, you need not listen to any doctrines or moral teachings. You can do whatever you like, criminal or immoral. However you must be smart enough not to be caught and punished by law or by your victims. The human world is just another jungle ruled by Jungle Law: the fittest survive; the strong feed on the weak. You may rob, kill, and rape your victims just like a tiger preying on a rabbit without feeling sorry. But then pops up immediately a question: why mankind need to be so intelligent then if they are just another group of  wild animals?

Subconsciously you tend to reject such beastly life style. However what other theories can you bring out to refute it? In fact, human beings did come from primates which evolved from lower class of animals (for that reason, human beings still retain some trace of beastly instincts). Somehow through the deliberate insertion of  bigger number of spirits into the brain (this is no longer Dawin's evolution model), an intelligent species emerged. These brain spirits are pre- grouped to become soul units. A few soul units can form an integral soul which resides in a human body in a way similar to a driver sitting in a car. The soul units remain seated by the attraction of the bio-chemical electric force developed by the human body (similar to a safety belt of the driver seat).  Upon death of the human body, the electric force stops and the soul units would float out. Whether the soul units can stay grouped as an integral soul depends on the will of the various soul units. Usually if they consider that such grouping is meaningful, they would continue to stay intact and find reincarnation in the next life (just like a driver taking a new car after the previous one is scrapped). Suppose  an integral soul comprises  say 10 soul units (incidentally this is what Toaism alleges), and suppose only 6 soul units are willing to stay behind, then they have to take in another 4 new soul units to replace those leaving ones before they can form another integral soul and start another reincarnation. Such regrouping is very common. But why don't most soul units like to stay intact and and why they prefer regrouping? This has something to do with" cultivation progress". Imagine you are a soul unit eligible to join other soul units to become an integral soul. Yet in this soul you  take a very low position (e.g. as an Improver, boiler fuel man,  in a steam ship, which here means a human body). You are ambitious to get promotion and hope to become one day the captain of the ship. So after the death of the ship (human body), you naturally would leave the group and tend to look for a higher calibre somewhere else in a new group, this time as a Fitter (a mechanic) on merit of your Improver working experience. If you succeed, you would learn (cultivate and harvest)a higher technique in this new life. We call this the" cultivation progress" of  a soul unit. By repeated and continuous cultivation progress, the soul unit can one day call the shots in an integral soul.

However there are times when the integral soul would remain intact. This happens when the soul unit members find it useful and valuable to remain intact in view of the good harvested cultivation of the soul during the previous life (a joint efforts). That is to say, during the previous life, that person did make efforts to move towards the Mission. The closer you have moved towards the Mission, the more cultivated is your soul. Of course that means in your previous life, you already understood that you were not in this world to seek enjoyment and sensual  pleasures but were here for something else (though you might not yet have a clear picture of what that mission was). The earlier you wake up (Great Awakening), the earlier your cultivation begins. The converse is true, the more cultivated your soul is, the earlier you awaken.  In other words if one is given to debauchery, then upon one's death, one's soul units would consider such grouping a failure. They would then disband. One's soul has disintegrated (though individual soul units still remain) and the soul can not make a comeback. This is the biggest Punishment to an integral soul! That is why I pointed out earlier that Karma did not work but the self-assessment did.. 

The unanimous goal of all free spirits in the Universe is same and those who have come to the globe Earth participate as pioneers in carrying out that research Mission. Some free spirits have gone through all  the necessary trainings during their participations in the various live forms (from basic simple lives to, plants and to very complicated mammals) and are now able to group to become soul units (not yet the human integral souls). These semi-cultivated  soul units take command in animals . Each soul unit (perhaps only one soul unit per creature)can be identified as the Identity of that creature. This means that if you cut off the legs of a cat, the cat is still alive because its soul unit still remains in the brain. This is the life evolution process following Dawin's theory. The evolution however went in different directions with the aim of finding an ideal version of life capable of the Mission. At one time, dinosaurs were believed to be a good model in view of their big sizes and physical power. Yet for 0.15 billion years these dinosaurs made no progress at all in the sense of the Mission. So a time was reached finally when it was decided not to go along the dinosaur line any more and to call it a failure. No free spirits would thence reincarnate as parts of dinosaurs. That is why there are so many dinosaur fossil eggs found unhatched. Whether the dinosaurs were killed by adverse global environmental conditions caused by the K.T. Asteroid (collision) or mega volcanic eruptions would not change the fate of dinosaurs. Only after the dinosaurs were removed  could  there be conditions conducive to the evolution of  a more appropiate species, the primates. Maybe a primiate requires more than 1 soul unit to command its behavior and identity, but that is not very satisfactory as primates are not intelligent enough. So eventually we mankind have emerged as described above. At the moment we are the pioneer species entrusted with the Mission and are supported by other secondary lives.

With such commitment , all of us must value our lives and cultivate ourselves non-stop regardless of our age or health or plight. You must do so in order to keep your soul intact, because "You" is identified with your "integral soul" spiritually though your body physically. Your body will decay upon your death, but not your soul which can take another available body.

The readers may be desparate to know what  proper cultivations are. It is worth to spend some time to elaborate on cultivations. In short, cultivation is the accumulated efforts one has made in moving towards the Mission (as far as mankind can go). I would elaborate on the Mission later after the introduction of Big Impact Theory. For now just take that Mission as some kind of research work aiming at finding out the viable ways of making the spactime universe vanish as soon as possible (so as to pay off the debt or wiping out the consequences of that traffic accident). In order to do that, a person must study hard the spacetime universe (physics and cosmology in association with those hints in various religions) and reveal the secrets of it. This is what a Zeroist terms " Mental cultivation心修". Nonetheless this is a tedious process and takes years after years and lives after lives before it can be done. One must be determined , steadfast, courageous, and thoughtful enough to hang on years after years and lives after lives. A lot of virtues are required of such a "practitioner 行者" who must have  probity, abstinence, frugality, patience,  vagor, and valor. In short he or she must be able to tolerate  hardships and advance in the direction of the Mission. This is termed "Spiritual Cultiviation靈修".  In order to cultivate mentally and spiritually, one must have an excellent health , a health that is much better than an ordinary chap. One must be trained and inured to all kinds of bodily hardship and be immune to most diseases. This would enable that practitioner to have a longer life span  (e.g. 200 years instead of the common 60-70 years). With such longer life span, the total cultivation is expected to be great.  Yet a cultivated person is not immune to accidents since he or she enjoys no privilege at all. Anyway this is called "Bodily cultivation身修".

All these sound similar to a buddist monk or nun who leads an abstinent life. Yes, very similar and the short-term goals are almost same: to seek a self understanding and then the meaning of life.But what a buddhist seeks in the long run differs from a zeroist.  Buddhists aspire to become buddhas and then to salvage the souls of all animals and mankind (whether vegetation is included is not sure) by liberating them from the 6-level-merry-go-round (but no idea what to do afterwards). A zeroist cultivates to become hopefully a cultivated soul who shall then, in joint efforts with others, execute the plan to make the spacetime universe vanish. By doing so, all the entangled spirits would be freed , pair to vanish . Spacetime would be disassembled to become time and space and all convertible energies would turn back to pristine energy and are ready to pair with the anti-energy universe for a total annihilation. After that Zeroism would be brought back to action and spiritutal universes would emerge and evolve again as eons before.

So we are now adequately equipped to revisit some of the generally accepted but wrong ideas and fallacies in various sectors, social and  religious. We discuss them in below point by point .

1. That it is not right to kill animals for food

This is what the buddhists advocate.They believe that ending others' lives is a sin (if not a crime) and would have to be paid for by Karma. According to the Mission Theory, those secondary lives are to support the pioneer lives (human beings) and by doing so these secondary lives get training and cultivation progress. So next time when you kill a fish for dinner, do not feel guilty . As long as you do not waste food and are not killing creatures for joy or pleasure or unnecessarily or excessively, you are acting properly. Of course  all kinds of food are to support your health to enable you to persue the Mission. Yet certain meat we should refrain from eating, beef, mutton, horse meat, and bush meats. Not because these meats are harmful to your health but consumption of them would cause significant environment pollution. Certain countries rear cattle and sheep and produce significant carbon dioxide and methane gas pollution. They need not do that in fact, they could grow crops and fruits in stead. Yet it is the big money  they can earn that drives them to harm the environment..

2. That it is right to enjoy life

They say: you only live once, so you have to enjoy it

They say: live fast and die hard

They say: you need to face life everyday anyway, so why not be a happy guy?

All these sound pleasant but lack substance. These remarks do not have any basis theory to support them. A theory that must be applicable to everyone and not just you and me. If everybody can enjoy life, who is to suffer?  When there is pleasure there must be suffering. You are able to enjoy life simply because you have the resources handy to you. You enjoy life at the expense of those who have less or no resources.These resources were not brought to this world by you. You snatched them somewhere from your victims or competitors (e.g in a stock speculation market), your parants or ancestors who might have snatched them from some other parties (e.g. some people invaded others and took away the land and possessions). Many people because of the crimes and sins they committed ages ago,  became wealthy and famous and they passed down the wealth to their offsprings who continue to be wealthy. In fact, if everyone was ever fair to others, there could not have been billionaires.

Some may argue that pleasure could be something spiritual and not necessarily material-based. For instance, those volunteer medics risk their lives in warzones or battlefields to save lives of the wounded people. They derive pleasure from the heroic acts. Yes, they are good people, courageous and generous. Yet they must thank the war-mongers for milling out so many wounded and dying people for them to save. Without the war-mongers, the volunteer medics would find themselves less helpful and less happy.

All I want to show is that whenever there is pleasure or happiness there is suffering or pain. Remember the Mission theory, we are here not to seek pleasure or to attend to human problems but are here for the Mission. So why not spend more time on Mission? The volunteer medics could have contributed more by awakening people to the Mission. The more people get awake, the more peaceful this world will be.  Saving lives in battlefiled is some achievement but is not contributive towards the Mission. Heroic battlefield stories repeat and repeat and have been told similarly for ages and would continue to be told for years to come unless we awaken the war-mongers.

Besides, no one is entitled to pollute the global environment by consuming resources in a lavish manner just for his /her peronsal enjoyment. While it is politically correct to say environment protection is everybody's business but few people are actually giving a damn to it. Openly some celebrities promote vigorously environment protection, but privately they organise pleasure parties to fly to Switzerland or Japan for skiing, have binging fun on pleasure boats, hold grandeur banquets for birthday celebrations, shop for luxurious items in Paris,  etc. etc. All these activities consume a lot of energy and resources and create a lot of greenhouse gases and chemical wastes. I once watched a race driver on  TV promoting the use of  wasted edible oil mixed with fossil oil as the fuel , and he claimed credit  in protecting the environment  by declaring himself  an "Environmentally friendly race driver". What a farce!

One may argue that such enjoyment is appropiate as some kind of rewards for one's achievement. The problem is that once you have such enjoyment, you are hooked to it. The sensual and sensational pleasures are addictive, and you cannot wake up so easily. If you consider that enjoyment or improved quality of living  is the motivator for your ambition, then your philosophy would be very different from the Mission theory's. You are farther and farther away from the Mission. 

Pleasure and suffering go in pairs. An angler feels happy but the fish writhes in agony. You feel happy when you get the approved loan, but you feel the pressure when you are asked to repay it.  You felt happy when the stock market was bullish and now you feel sorry because the market is bearish. In short, if you do not want sorrow, you should not have happiness in the first place. Intentionally or unintentionally, the global financial meltdown comes at the right moment: we human beings have exploited all sorts of means to the extreme and have to bear the consequence now.  Please take the time to reflect on the past sins and wrongs. Wake up please fellas!

3. No pain, No gain!

There is not much wrong with this statement apparantly. But there are some special cases that demand special attention.

a. What about those that were born with a silver spoon in the mouth? They did not work hard  to earn a living  and hence did not suffer any pains yet they have wealth from their parants and families. They have every resource available to them. For these silver spooners, I hope they  would use the resources well in order to benefit the world in the sense of Mission. On the surface, they have not suffered any pains in making a living, yet they are most vulnerable to indulgence and hedonism. It would take a very long time for them to awaken to the Mission or they simply do not wake up at all. You know what price they would have to pay eventually for such "lucky life".  In that case, one has the gains first, and pays for them later. 

b. What about the inverse or converse" There is pain, there is gain"? This is not always true, or  strictly speaking not true at all. I have witnessed several cases where a person stayed  with his persuit for ideal despite all the adversities, yet he gained nothing at the end of his life. Take A. Einstein for example, he was a genius and he achieved a lot in physics during his first half of life. Yet he made little progress in his later 30 years' attempt to discover the TOE (Theory of everything). One of my friends decided to take up that unfinished mission and carried on for another 30 years only to find that such theory could not be found. He has converted himself to Christian and has resigned himself to the belief that universe was a creation of God and therefore it could never be understood. My friend of course  is not right. The reason that he could not get what he wanted is that "he did not look for it in the right place".  That sounds like a tautology ( Tautolgoy is some high-sound but empty talk, e.g  Her mother is no one else but  a woman.). One could not recover the lost thing because one did not find it in the right place; that is obvious or one could have recovered it!  But my answer is definitely not a tautology. The point is my friend did not lose anything in the first place, he only looked for something which did not and does not exist at all.  A.Einstein made the same mistake too.  His General Relativity postulates that Gravity is not a force but some kind of distorted geometry of spacetime. Yet he attempted to look for a theory that would merge these 4 forces together . In other words he was trying to restore the force nature of gravity and merge it with the other 3 forces (or vice versa). My freind shared his view because of the Big Bang Theory (a misleading one)

In fact there are physicists that ever try to modify or refute Einstein's GR in this sense. They want to include gravity as a force  featuring the exchange of a boson called Graviton. Yet up to this moment gravitons have not been discovered.

Big Impact Theory defends GR and rules out the existence of gravitons. Gravity was never unified with the other 3 forces. Nevertheless, there is a" theory of everything" very different from today's physics which must be rewritten to take into account of the presence of spirits and the roles they are playing.

You may laugh at the idea of rewriting physics. But that is no joke. GR is a theory that applies to the relationship between cosmos and galaxies which are separated by regions believed to be vacua (after the idea of ether not proved) . The vacua  later are believed to be not a real vacuum but regions teeming with energy  (such as virtual particles popping in and out  as proposed by  S.Hawking's black hole radiance). The idea  that gravity has something to do with the geometry of the spacetime implies that the universe is a spacetime continuum and that these so called vacuum regions change the profiles and contours  when they are in proximity to a galaxy or blackhole or the like. That is, gravity is related to the distored spacetime. The above is half true. According to Big Impact Theory the intergalactic regions are spatial regions (not spacetime regions) and it is these regions that are expanding (as one can check from Robertson Walker's metric equation). As such there are no static or permanent spacetime matters in these regions. Photons that pass through these spatial regions would experience red shifting. Can anybody tell me where a red-shifted photon's lost energy has gone and what  the final fate of that photon  will be? Don't answer in a haste, it is not so easy.

In fact further study along that line would reveal that the spacetime universe is composed of to a large extent spatial regions interlaced with spacetime regions as debris. Within the debris there are also semi-like spatial regions. It is this discreteness of spacetime regions that give rise to the Quantum features of spacetime particles and energy. All I want to mention here, Big Impact Theory succeeds to relate these spatial regions to spirits.  If you are smart enough, you may figure out now why GR's predicted gravity is not significant on sub-atomic scale.

People say that GR breaks down at Black holes or singularities. But according to Big Impact theory, there are no singularities in this spacetime  universe(of course blackholes must be there but they are no sinularities).  All the above will be discussed more in detail when the Big Impact Theory is introduced.

Ending discussion on "No Pain, No gain" I would reiterate that wealth, unnecessary know-hows, unnecessary knowledge, fame and power are not really gains, they may even be called ill-gotton gains in the strictest sense. On one's death, all these so called assets are only left-overs in the human world. What one's soul can take away will only be the cultivation which would be very useful in the next life in the pursuit of Mission. Taoist Thought affirms this line of thinking  by saying "為學日益,聞道日損" (if you pursue Dao correctly, you would only need to learn those that are necessary and abandon those that are unnecessary). So you know in fact we do not need those knowledge such as Investment know-how, Economics, Military Strategy, Marketing, Finacial Planning, Politics,etc etc. which unfortunately most World leaders are still focusing on (they are finding solution from problems by creating another problem). No wonder the world is still as chaotic as it was.  That is why Confuscius孔夫子 once said " 朝聞道,夕可死矣" (if the whole world one day understands Dao, all its people may die)

4) They say: competition brings progress

Apparantly, it is correct. But an in-depth munching of the statement reveals the undesirable tastes. It brings jealously, confrontation, and even wars. Look at the competitions among countries in economy, military power, sports, technologies. The competitions are not for the good of all human beings but for their country fellows (but I doubt this either). You don't have to look far, just take Olympia event for instance. The so called sports are not actually sports. All the atheletes are professionals, they take sports as their career. How can we take some physical exercises which are meant to be done in leisure time to be a career? That is non-sense. The only reason is that these atheletes know it is a quick way to rise to fame and make money. They would try all means to increase their physical strength and power. Some may even take forbidden steroids or the like. That is some cheat their way up. They know once they win the game, they would be sought after by commercial advertisements which would bring in millions of dollars. If one athelete finds a quick way to improve the performance, he/she would not like to tell the others because this would jeopardise his/her position or glory. That is self-fishness. What I want to say is: Only exchange of information and views would bring progress and bring unity.. Under the Mission theory, we all human beings should share what we have found about the mission in order to complete it soonest possible. Thus the so called Olympic spirit is empty despite all the impressive slogans. In a nutsell it is an event for fame/money chasing , an event full of greed and disappointment, an event full of nationalism rather than globalism, an event that produces  lots of waste and consumes lots of resources..

5. They say: If you do things not against your conscience, don't cringe because you are right.

Again this is universally accepted. But take a deeper look, the so called conscience varies from person to person. A person's honey can be poison to others. This is particularly true in today's materialistic world. People bend the rules and ethics to serve their purposes. Some war- mongers assail other countries in the name of god or ethics or whatnots just to hide their ulterior motives.   In the court the accused's counsel always uses conscience as a final tactic  to move the judge and  jury to have mercy on the accused. A major share holder motions to buy back all the shares (privatisation) of his listed company (which has accumulated a lot of undistributed profits) by offering a humble  buy-back share price , yet he in unshamed boldness says openly that he feels no qualm because there is nothing against his conscience (because he thinks he is taking care of the interests of the small investors). This is a typical case of situation ethics. People devise some ethics to justify  their own sinful behaviors.

What about justice as a replacement of conscience? Again, judicial system varies from place to place, from race to race, and  from time to time,  In ancient China, it was a glory for a man to have many wives and concubines. Today in China, a man  can bring himself criminal cases and torts by having more than one wife. When something that is variable, and not invariant with time, it is not a reliable thing. Thus we should not use justice alone to be the yardstick to determine whether a behavior is appropiate. Afterall most laws are designed to protect the interests of the privileged groups, i.e. to protect those who have (rich) from those who have not (poor). Different persons in different situations would see laws in different perspectives. This is taking place in courts everyday (may be not on holidays)  and a lawyer sees a law in 2 entirely different ways depending  on whether he/she represents the plaintiff or the defendant, the  prosecutor or the accused..

As such, it appears there is no real way to tell if a behavior is right or wrong, bad or good, immoral of moral, benign or malignant. Yes, there is one objective way! Zeroism. If you view things from Zeroism, there are only two directions: one is towards the Mission, and one is away from the Mission. The former direction is pro-Mission or pro-Zeroism (顺道), the latter anti-Mission or anti-Zeroism(逆道). This is the most reliable and objective yardstick to tell if what you did or what you want to do is beneficial to the earlier completion of the Mission or not. If everyone would use this yardstick , things would have been totally different today. We would require no ethics, no laws, no religions, no conscience to rein  our indulgence or misbehavior. We would just act naturally (you may say according to our basic instincts) and spontaneously without even ever thinking of acting otherwise. As Lao Tze老子 wrote: 大道廢,有仁義 (if the first choice of Dao is not available, we are forced to adopt ethics and justice system as alternative to rule the world), and  Mencius孟子 said: 人之初,性本善(the basic instinct of a person is good-natured). It is because that we forget our intrinsic mission that we have been reduced to violent,cunning, cruel, and greedy animals or Big pests.

So if you accept Mission Theory, most of human beings today are nothing but big pests, harming the globe with all kinds of pollutions, boasting of their self-imputed glories, promoting patriotism and nationalism to divide people, instilling our youngsters with incorrect  social values and aspirations (to become investers to rob, to become lawyers to bend the laws, to become doctors to serve wealthy patients, to become politicians to instigate the mass, to become soldiers to kill, to become top jockeys so people can bet on their horses, to become business men to cheat). There is no unfriendly criticism. If you really become a sucessful business man you have to  rip off your customers; if you are a successful lawyer, you must be able to gag  the judge, if you are a famous surgeon, you must only operate on the wealthy people who can afford the costly medication; if you are a powerful politician, you know how to pander to the desires of the public.  We then label those who have attained such positions as successful personalities. Are they really successful persons? I am sorry to say, they are not. Wrong targets and expectations are often set by parents for their kids. Why they want to pass their expectations to their kids and why don't they invest instead more on themselves (being still young at the age of 20's or 30's) by doing more cultivations ? Without themselves understainding the meaning of life, how can they expect their children to do better? The same argument applies to the world leaders. They claim they have the ability to build a good country and harmonious society, yet they know in their hearts  what they claim is not true, because their theories are not self-sustaining. If country A prospers in terms of economy, country B next to it or somewhere  away from it would have less resources at disposal for its people. In short country A prospers at the expense of country B. One plausible theory is to dig out all the resources from the Earth and distribute them to all countries, then all countries would suddenly become rich and wealthy. Would that end the conflicts and would that stop currency inflation and global warming?  No,it would bring even more troubles. So to solve the global problem, we need to have in mind an ideal model of how the world should tick and how people should fare. None of the world leaders have such a model and none of them can build that model because it is not within their ambits. But the "Zeroist team "model is an answer and I doubt that anyone else can put forward a better model.

Being cynical, critical and sarcastic, I am not alone. There have been many similar comments by my predecessors. The difference is that none was or has been able to support his/her comments with a theory that is consistent throughout and compatible with science and other religions (I would discuss how the Zeroism/Mission theory/Big Impact Theory are compatible with the core values of all religions and physics and cosmology), and most of all has a solution.

Many may say that the Zeroist team model is abstract,  not pragmatic, and can never materialize. Let me ask a question, would it be easier to change the mind of an individual than to change the national policies? Certainly, through enunciation and education (with patience), we may re-set the mind of individuals so that many of them may re-orientate with Zeroism again. As long as we have many and many people re-orientated, there is a hope  to rotate the various national policies to align with Zeroism one day.  Of course the task is very difficult and tedious, but it is not impossible  if we are determined ,as Lao Tze said:千里之行,始於足下 (a thousand mile walk begins with your feet).

Using the Zeroist yardstick and understanding that today's mankind are big pests waiting to be awakened, we see it is no big deal for  Big Pests saving lives of Big pests, for prolonging unnecessarily lives of big pests (to hinder the process of cultivation by soul regrouping), and treating infertility to produce more big pests. You can see that all such self-proclaimed glories about charities/heroic stories/life saving medical researches are meaningless until people have reset their minds to understand the real meaning of life.  The same comment is on the Environmentalists who pulmagate the idea of protecting the environment by leading a simple life for the next generation. But the counter arguments are " I have no kids, but I have money, so why should I give up luxurious life style and skimp on everything?" , "This is like to take me to a buffet dinner and then tell me  not to eat  much for the sake of the late comers, I am not happy" ,"If global warming causes Venice and Maldives  to disappear soon, I must make full use of my time to visit all such scenic spots before they vanish", " Global warming anyway cannot be stopped, it makes little difference if Human can live a few decades longer. So why should I not  enjoy drinking/eating/shopping/touring everyday?". So some people or maybe a majority of people would think and act in the opposite way. To be honest, had it not been the Mission theory, I would have been on the spree of indulging in all sorts of sensual and sensational pleasures too.

One of the weakness of human beings is that they (we) are sentimental. They are too easy to be moved by apparantly touching moments and stories. They cry and weep in response to tragedies that are shown on TV and newspapers, but they pretend not to hear anything similar that is not publicised. Besides that kind of sentiment usually lasts for a few days, or hours, or even minutes. What is worse is that those who show sympathy to those suffer many a time are the indirect creators of the tradegies. For example, most professionals and government officials are high paid people, their income could be 20 to 100 times those of the average people, or even 10000 times  those of poor people. The latter for the sake of livelihood, are always under stress which can cause severe health problems (such as cancers) and mental disorder. Say a cargo van driver who has to work overtime under stress in order to make both ends meet, has his car crashed and has  both legs to be ampulated. The doctors are sympathetic, the traffic police are sympathetic, the wealthy employer is sympathetic.  But they are partly responsible for the plight of that poor driver, because they take more than they should leaving very little for the poor. Every year, a government earmarks  monies for health care, education, social security, etc. etc. but a majority (can be 70% or 80%)of the money goes to the high-paid  administration staff, doctors, government officials, and other professionals, leaving very little for the patients ,general public, and other needy sectors.  As long as some people consider themselves elite and deserve more of the resources, then there can never be a solution.  Their so called sympathy is nothing but hypocrisy. 

On the stage of trophy  and prize presentation, it is common to hear a winner or laureate say loudly " I thank my country, I am proud of my country, I am proud to be a  X...an or X...ese". All these remarks are in fact provocative, drawfing other countries and eclipsing their peoples. If you are proud of  your country, then I shall feel disgraced by my country, right?. While one gives acclaim and pride to one's country, one is planting hatred and jealousy with other countries and hurting their people's feeling.. Hence, promoting patriotism only promotes nationalism and helps to build  walls among peoples of different races and tribes, who are already divided by cultures, religions, traditions, and geographic boundaries.

There are many similar topics which I would not like to discuss, but you should use your new mindset to judge whether human beings should pursue advances in the following areas:-

a. transplantation of human organs,

b.stem cell research,

c. antiboitics and virus vaccines research,

c.travelling around the world in the name of widening one's horizon

d. studying ways and techniques to make people feel happy

e. plastic surgery

I hope that you would also agree that for the Mission, people should lead a simple life, do not travel very often, do not reproduce (or multiply)  unnecessarily (the globe has been over populated much),do not look for exciting entertainments and other indulgent sensual pleasures, and do not waste time on unnecessary issues. Men then do not gamble on sports/matches/horses/boxing etc. Women need not waste time on cosmetics and make-up to entice men into loving them or giving them extra benefits. When a man finds out that his loved female in fact is not as nice looking as she appeared under a make-up mask, in doctored dress, and on high heel shoes, he may regret for marrying her. In fact I once heard a man shortly after the marriage cry out " it is a deception. I must divorce her" and he did !.  In a "Zeroist team" model society, everyone should be true and sincere to others, no deception is necessary. A man should not marry a woman for her superficial beauty, and a woman should not marry a man for financial consideration. We are just team members and come together for the big job. You may note that I reject so many  medical researches, not because I have personal bias, but because they would become unncessary when everyone excercises some sort of physical (bodily) cultivation. The bodily cultivation would give you a good health , strong body plus a good look. As long as you are devoted to the Mission, your body (which is  made up of a number of locked and free spirits arranged in a pyramid chain of command, and which is something your integral soul borrows) begins to understand that your soul is going in a certain desirable direction. The understanding is first perceived by those  free spirits at the top of the pyramid. As time goes by, the message would be passed down and received (particularly after regular proper physical exercises and hardship endurance) by those down the hierachy. Those free spirits who get the message would hesitate to leave the body (they would if they feel they have stayed long enough)and are ready to stay within the body to serve the soul as long as they can. In this sense, a cultivated soul appears to have a better communication with those low level subordinate body free spirits and would expect to live a longer and healthier life than those who are less cultivated. Such communication has built a harmony from top to low level . The more cultivated your soul is , the greater will be the harmony, or we can say that the stronger will be your Qi氣.

Now, let us begin to discuss how the Mission theory (or Zeroism and Big Impact theory) finds compatibility in other religions and science. You would find eventually that in fact all religions and science are not mutually exclusive, there is a common bridge linking them together. So followers or believers of religion A should not call religion B and C heretical or vice versa. Every religion has a core value,  it is those later man-made fallacies around it that have overshadowed it. All these core values are answerable to the Spacetime universe questions which have been or have not been raised by the scientists. Let us single out the core values of each religion and then discuss how they are compatible with the Mission theory/big impact theory/ Zeroism and Science.

1. Catholicism

The core values in fact are historical ones, they are

a. That the universe was created by God

b. That the lives were created by God

According to Big Impact theory, the spiritual universes  due to sudden greed of a group of free spirits in one universe, bumped at the wrong tempo, wrong pace and wrong meeting point. As a result the spacetime universe was accidentally born. The untrapped free spirits , caught by such surprise, attempted after some time to stop the expanding spacetime universe by orchestrating a tug -of- war to pull back the universe  in the hope of restoring the original condition before the accident . For some reason, they lost in the exercise but managed to lead to the emergence of Quasars, black holes, then galaxies, then clusters etc. Without that tug of war, there would not have been galaxies that are amenable to the development (or creations) of simple lives on some planets like Earth, the globe on which we and other lives are flourishing.  In one sense, today's spacetime universe and its organic lives are attributable to those free spirits whom we may call God collectively.

Other than the above historical values, there  is not much to say about this religion. Though the doctrines are  to observe the 10 commandments, they are not directly related to the spacetime universe or the Intrinsic Mission human beings have.

2. Confuscianism

It is no religion at all, as there is no God or God centred theology. It touches something about Dao (the veiled Zeroism) . Look at the following remarks:

a. 率性之謂道: If you follow your instinct, you are close to Dao.

b.人之初,性本善: Everyone is born with a good nature (this is another way of saying  a))

c.孔子曰:朝聞道,夕可死矣: Confucius said: If the world understands Dao in the morning, its people may die in the evening (that means when the human mission is over, human beings are no longer necessary)

d.五十知命 : by the age of 50, you should know your Mission任命 (but most people take it for the fate天命).  This is of course only possible when you have cultivated for some years. Unfortunately this is not the case for most people

e.天將降大任于斯人也,必先苦.其心志,勞其筋骨,餓其體膚: If the heaven is going to give the guy a mission, then it must first make that person suffer to suffer fustration, to labour, and to starve.  I agree totally except for the fact that the (and not a) Mission does not come from Heaven. Yes, it is necessary. As it takes time for one to awaken to the Mission, one must first be prepared for that mission to come to the scene. He has to become inured to all sorts of hardships and be determined to face them and to wait for the Mission (whatever that mission is). So you should not get used to good living conditions in the first place otherwise it would not be easy for you to abandon them in future.

Though there is not much we can learn from Confuscianism about the direct mission, it provides us with  guidelines on how to behave in the world according to propriety (which later led to Law and Order). Of course this is not the ideal choice, yet before the world awakens to Zeroism,  Confucianism seems the only choice.

3. Taoist Thoughts

Again it is not a religion. It has however given us a lot of revelations (the most informative ones). The core values are of several parts. We discuss them one by one (note the order is important)

a. The core values that identify the problem

(i) 道可道,非恆道 (非常道), literally, it means " Dao that is describable is not the eternal Dao". This is the usual interpretation. But it is meaningless if we just take the face value. So we may consider the alternative interpretation " The mechanism that is describable is not the eternal mechanism". This makes some sense, but not very complete, and you are still at a loss. In the context of Zeroism we may give a more consistent interpretation: The mechanism that now governs the evolution of spacetime universe can be described (in terms of physics and cosmology), but it is no longer the same old eternal mechanism (that governed the evolution of spiritual universes).

This tells that Zeroism has been perturbed (disturbed or interrupted)

 (ii). “名可名,非恆名(非常名)。無名,天地之,有名,萬物之母-Literallycontents can be described, but they are not the same old contents. Nameless contents gave birth to Heaven and Land, while named contents gave rise to all matters.  In today's language The contents of the spacetime universe can be named, but they are no longer the same old eternal ones (those of spiritual universes).  The intangible one (the gravitational Einstein Tensor) is responsible for the spacetime geometry. The tangible one ( the matter-energy-stress tensor) is responsible for all the matters in the universe. "  In a deeper language, matters and spacetime are being created or destroyed endlessly; thus an ever expanding or contracting universe, but not a static one

 Thus these remarks have pointed out the basic problem of the current Spacetime universe: i.e. the contents are not those old eternal ones, so is the mechanism of universe development and operation.

b. The core values that suggest how the universe problem be studied

 (i)故恆無欲,以觀其妙;恆有欲,以觀其徼”- Literally “constantly but objectively, study the internal wonders; constantly and intentionally, study the overall requirement”

In the context of Zeorism, it is “to study the physics of the spacetime universe constantly and objectively, and to study constantly but intentionally what this problem requires or what is expected (i.e. mission ) of human beings (by the spiritual world).”  It tells us how to gather information for study and analysis and implies a Mission .

 

c.The core values that suggest how the problem may be handled and solved

 

 “ニ者同出而異,皆謂之玄。玄之又玄,眾妙之門” –Literally,

“these 2 parts (tangible and intangible) are same but differ in names, both can be called perplexity; perplexity after perplexity, the way to all wonders”

In today’s language “Both tangible part and intangible part are different in name but come from the same puzzle ( i.e. tangible part on one side and intangible part on the other side of the same unsolved equation).. Puzzle resolution (e.g. solving an Einstein’s field equation) leads to another puzzle resolution (e.g. solving another Einstein field equation). This is the key to finding the truths about all the wonders.”

This seems to reiterate Einstein's celebrated gravitation equation:

spacetime geometry (tensor)= energy (tensor). ; in compact form G=8πT

Nevertheless, all these remarks have suggested ways to study the problems and find the solutions.

Believe it or not, this is the earliest version of Einstein gravitation equation in Ancient China, it appeared 2400 years earlier than Einstein's!

There are other revelations from Taoist thoughts, but either they are less important or they are too subtle to be translated into common language, I decide not to discuss them for now.

d.The core values that reveal some phenomena in physics:-

 (i) “,其中有物,其中有象” – Literally “It is flickering, but some matter can be observed and sometime an image can be observed” (this seems to refer to Heinsenbergs uncertainty, and quantum physics, and the duality of photon like particles). String theory tends to describe that all particles are made up of string type constituents, the vibration or resonance of which determines the nature of the particle. Incidentally this is very similar to the Big Impact Theory in that a most basic/elementary particle consists of a time spirit pair attached by a length of energy filament pair to a neutral hot and cold pristine energy pack stored in the housing of a spatial spirit. The filament length and torsion state determine the nature of the particle. It is the frequent attempts of the time spirits to escape from the bond that make the particle (same for the composite particles the nucleus , then the atom) vibrate. Localisation of vibration waves gives rise to the physical appearance and location of the particle.

4)Buddhist Thoughts

(i)Taoist thought is not alone in revealing the relations between spacetime and matters, almost at the same time Buddhist thought did the same and even took it a  step further by claiming

色即是空,空即是色” – Literally “Color is space, space is color”. In general relativity language “ Matter-energy-stress tensor is same as spacetime geometry, and the reverse is true”. This is the General Relativity' s gravitational law. In its most compact form,  Einstein tensor, Gαβ = (8Gπ/c^4) Tαβ ,the energy-stress tensor. In short Eeinstein alleges that matters create spacetime, and Hawking alleges that spacetime (gravity) creates matters. Next time when one says參透色空(understanding color/space relationship), check if one really understands what one says.

(ii)Buddhist thought formulates the following attitudes that human beings should assume:

不執着,破無明,明心見性” – Literally “Don't be obsessed, take away the blinkers , brighten your heart and you will see the true self” (It tells people how to live a life: don't be stubborn and obsessed with sensual pleasures and materialistic enjoyment, do not blind yourself with unwise thinking and behavior though we live in a Matter-dominated universe or hence materialistic world and might be misled to forget our nature; take a deep look into yourself and to study the necessary knowledge and you would understand your intrinsic mission and the role you are to play in this world. "Take a deep look into your true self "is similar to the Toast Thought's "返璞(樸) 歸真"

The interpretation of revelation (ii) should be more acceptable to most buddhist readers than revelation (i). Most buddhist readers may find interpretation (i) too outrageous and far from their conventional perception, which is mainly related to human mind (be it transcendental or not). I would consider the conventional perception some kind of Mental (in fact spiritual) Cultivation guildlines or instruction. If we are to seek ultimate truth and if revelation (i) is for that purpose, then it should trascend the Human Epoch. In other words, the truth should exist there objectively, independent of the existence of  the human mind . My interpretation (i) above serves that purpose, and it is compatible with the Big Impact Theory and today's cosmology theories. So I find no problem in such interpretation. Of course every reader can keep his/her own perception, but there is no harm to keep mine as a supplement or complement.

Revelation (ii) despite its general compatibility with the Mission theory,  lacks the instruction about Bodily Cultivation. This is a deficiency. Celibacy and Fasting(vegetarianism) do not help to provide an  excellent health. Suppression of sexual desire means building a hostile attitude towards the body spirits (in their evolution cultivation). Constant fasting and dieting would lead to weak health. Believe it or not, a survey some years ago  in Anhui about the health of a group of  buddhist nuns  revealed that all of them had suffered from some sort of anemia. It is therefore no surprise to see that buddhist nuns or monks are not among the longevity groups. It is a general notion among the buddhists that the human body is less important compared with the soul and after life and therefore many buddhist monks and nuns pay little attention to the well being of the body. This would lead to the early deterioration of health and would reduce the life span and hence the cultivation time. In contrast, Confuscianism emphasizes importance of both the psyche and body: 質勝文則野,文勝質則史,文質彬彬,方為君子 (only a balanced cultivation between intellect and health can give the required urbanity).

By ostractizing oneself to a hermetic life style, one believes that he/she would be far from secular and worldly troubles. This may be true but not advisable. If Buddhism is to settle the human troubles (which eventually are the spacetime universe problem), then one should engage oneself in studying these troubles (before the solution can be found).

(iii) 眾生平等. All sentient beings are equal

This is compatible with Mission theory (and Big Impact theory), which asserts that all free spirits are equal in status and that those who  have condescended onto the spacetime universe for the Mission are equal and no one is privileged.

(iv) 普度(渡)眾生(靈), Salvage all the sentient beings

This is again compatible with Mission theory. However "Sentient beings" must in this case include those trapped (locked and bound) spirits  (i.e. matters and convertible energies in various forms as alleged by Big Impact Theory) for which the salvation is meant to be launched..

In summary revelation (i) identifies the problem (spacetime problem), (iv) identifies the Ultimate Goal, while (ii) and (iii) outline the manner and steps on how to get it done.

At this point, some may ask that since the free spirits are free, why are they so keen to salvage those other trapped spirits? According to the Big Impact Theory, bound spirits litter in various regions, some in spacetime regions as convertible energies and particles, some in Dead Time Ring (Zone) as confined free spirits, some in spatial regions as medium spirits, and some in extremely stretched state in anti-energy -shell- universe. Because of the loss of freedom of different degrees, all the spirits other than the free spirits are suffering to different degrees. In one sense, we may say that there are different levels of hell (suffering houses). On the other hand, though the free spirits are not suffering , they are busy (distressed) in contriving ways to set free their counterparts without which they can never pair correctly to vanish to restore Zeroism. The ultimate goal of Buddhism is to salvage every spirit from every hell and set it free.On the premise of this interpretation, Buddhist thought has the common goal as the Mission Theory.

v) Now so much has been said about the human (spacetime ) problem and the manner to face it. What about the possible solutions? Are there really ways to solve the problem? Without going through detailed reasoning and analyses about the construction of cosmos and the spacetime universe, I can give a brief account on  theoretically possible ways and these happen to correspond to some hypotheses hinted by Buddhist thought. So one by one let us talk about them:

a)佛光普照, literally: The Buddha's light shines through the universe  

   Einstein's celebrated energy equation E=mcc (where E is energy, m is mass, c is light speed) tells us that a small mass can liberate a huge  amount of energy proportional to the square of light speed. In other words, all massive objects and particles in the spacetime universe actually came from light. By intuition,the direct method of making this spacetime universe vanish seems to go behind from where things came. So if we can turn all matters in this spacetime universe back to light, we would be close to the point of origin. 

According to Noether Theorem , charges are a symmetric debt of light's broken non-local symmetric energy state. Big impact theory takes it further by claiming that all masses came from light. So it sounds logical to say by turning all masses and convertible energies back to light , then the debt owed would be paid off. This seemed to be a school of thoughts among some past free spirits before they condescended onto this spacetime Earth. They  predicted that there would be a Totally Bright Epoch琉璃光世界 after the human phase and after the future buddhas take over . They even  designated the Position of those  future executive buddhas with some kind of light related titles such as 日光 (sunlight) and 月光(moon light) buddhas.

Before I discuss further the viability of this Hypothesis (a), let me tell you one thing. Light is a debt itself too, an entropic debt. Therefore changing everthing to light would not pay off all debt, something else must be done.

A star is a burning spacetime object, radiating light by nuclear  fusion process.So in one sense each star is in the process of repaying debt according to this hypothesis. There are trillions and trillions of stars along side with trillions and trillions of non-illuminating stars. Among the latter , there are the failed stars which we call brown dwarf stars. They failed to ignite themselves, yet they may be set to ignite again.  Though theoretically, it may not be possible to set everything illuminating, it is possible (according to Big Impact Theory)to increase the radiation intensity by many many times, causing eventually a negative radiation pressure (one of the amazing interpretations of Einstein's equation) significant enough to draw everthing close to start ignition.

To prove that the Hypothesis will work is the process of 證道 (feasibility approval), and those cultivated souls that can prove it would automatically become the future  executive  buddhas. Dear readers, particularly those buddhist readers, you now know that by clinging to the same  old sutras, mantras , religious written works or the like, you can at best derive some  vitamins for your spiritual cultivation. You must at the same time study physics and cosmologies  and other related mathematics for nutrients to enhance your mental cultivation.

I do not know if this Hypothesis works either, and there will be separate discussion on this and the other hypotheses later.  Anyway, it is absolutely essential to understand the nature of light, perhaps I should give some brief information on light. Up to now, scientists still do not know exactly  what light is, though some features are well documented and they are:

light is of dual role: as a particle (photon)and as a wave (EM wave); it has no mass; it travels with a constant speed in vacuum and is known to be the fastest moving spacetime particle; its  particle differs little from its anti-particle, it is itself a boson; it does not age;  and it can be diffracted, reflected, refracted, and polarised (linear polarization and circular polarization), it is an electromagnetic radiation, it can be red shifted and blue shifted, it can be interfered constructively and destructively

Some religious readers may find my advice above too bitter to swallow as my warning in essence disapproves their conventional way of cultivation on which they might have spent years. The feelings should be mixed. Some feel enlightened, some feel frustrated, some doubtful, and some would slight it  and continue to insist on their own conventional interpretation of 佛光普照 (i.e. the Buddhas let their mercy in the form of light shine through the world so that every soul can benefit from it). The conventional interpretation in my opinion is only a man-made expression to glorify a buddha and is analogous to the aural rings or halos over the heads of devines and holy saints in other religions. Buddhas as spirits  cannot radiate any light or photons which are particles belonging to the spacetime domain. 

It is better late than never, so better switch or adjust  your mental cultivation to be more in line with science development. You may be scared by the deepness and intricacy of mathematics, and physics, but as long as  you are determined, you can learn them bit by bit privately, or you can take a proper course . You are never too old to learn . I would really like to see some physicists and cosmologists would in future organise proper courses for free for their "team members"

Do not hesitate, and do not defer the switching. As the saying goes " The road to hell is paved with good intentions"(.明日復明日).

To reinforce what I say, I wish to tell you a parable. Imagine you are a country boy and you have won a lucky draw that gives you a ticket to see an Opera "The meaning of Life" in the city.You arrive at the theatre, light is out and you sit there and see some warnings on the curtain.

:"Don't speak loud . Don't snack., Don't spit. Don't pass the wind. Be tidy with your dress. Don't make  noise." Then the nature calls, and you leave the theatre for the wash room. Minutes later you return and find all the doors are closed. You do not know what to do. Anyway it is good to catch the last train so as not to  spend the night in the city. You return home late.  The next day you see your country fellows and they ask you about the opera. You then tell them: Don't speak loud, don't snack, don't spit, don't fart, be tidy with your dress, don't make a noise.

What you tell your country fellows are just basic requirements and rules for proper behaviour, but they are not the all of the Meaning of Life. What today we receive from various religions are about behavior, social duties and piety without actually touching the core problem

b)  苦海無涯,回頭是岸”- literally “There is no boundary in the sea of bitterness, it is better to go back and return to the shore”

It refers to the expanding spacetime universe ever expanding into the sea of limbo in an attempt to reach the remote anti-energy shell universe. It would take very very long time even if one day the other end could be reached. It is believed by a school of  buddhas (past and then contemporary) that it would be a  much  shorter journey to achieve the total vanishing by collapsing backward to the point of Big Impact and then making the proper pairing of spirits of the two remnant universes. The anti-energy shell universe would automatically disappear. This is the second hypothesis.

Suppose it works, then there are 2 scenarios.

I) Time reverses, all ages happen in the reverse order. According to Big Bang Theory (not Big Impact Theory, but similar in this respect), before today's Dust Era (or matter -dominated Era), it was the Radiation Era (or radiation -dominated era). So if time reverses,  events would move backward into the Radiation Era (which is similar to some extent to the Totally Bright Epoch琉璃光世界 of hypothesis a). So this b) is a Collateral hypothesis of  a).

You must however not expect a replay of happeningss , with your dead grand-grand father walking out of the grave, or some thing like that. When I say time reverses, I mean it still advances but it just takes another return path, and not along the same path along which it once proceeded. This is like driving a car to a round- about, make a 360 degree turn and then drive back along the same road but on the opposite lane. This corresponds to more or less a contracting spacetime universe, which is one of the 3 possible expansion models in cosmology theories. That is if the spacetime universe is a closed (not open nor flat) one, it would one day stop expansion (when the K.E.=P.E., or when the gravitational force takes over and pulls the spacetime universe backward) and the universe would begin to contract. However this cosmological model  would occur only by itself and would not be forced to do so and it would take at least 66 billion years to return to the point of minimum (theoretically not possible to zero point). The buddhist hypothesis here however implies a forced occurence (i.e. to make it happen soon and fast) under scenario (I). We name  it Hypothesis b( I) from now on.

II) Time  inverses. This means the time retreats along the path of procession. That is tantamount to the  playback of the a video tape. All happenings could be experienced again in the reverse order, and your grand-grand father would come out from the grave and become young again. When time recedes along the same path, the entropy  that it has created would be wiped out and memories would vanish. This is unlike the hypothesis b(I) where the entropy is conserved and continues to increase. In theory this would wipe out all the entropy up to the point of Big Impact . What about the time? Would time diminish to zero? We shall discuss this when we assess the merits of the above individual hypotheses. We name it Hypothesis b(II) from now on.

(c)慈航普渡,登彼岸. Litterally, to sail( across the sea of bitterness) en-masse with Mercy and to reach the opposite shore.

There however was a separate group of past buddhas and hence contemporary buddhas who object to the return journey hypotheses. Rather they think the solution could be found by sailing across the sea of limbo to find the anti-energy shell universe and get the annilhilation. Of course, that means let the spacetime universe expand, but  at a much faster speed. In order to do that, the  future executive buddhas must take the helm and adjust the expansion to the fastest but safe speed (i.e. sailing under the monitoring and control , 慈航).

Again most buddhist readers would be shocked by new interpretation of hypothesis (c) which they usually take it as a kind of metaphor to glorify the determinedness of the buddhas or bodhisattvas. Like it or not, this is the only consistent interpretation to be in line with cosmology and Big Impact theory if it really means something deep.

By now, most of the important core values of various religions have been revealed. Next, we would turn to discuss about the merits and viability of the various hypotheses in the context of cosmology. But before doing that, I would try to give some kind of explanation in simple terms about the  the so called Spacetime Universe (instead of Universe), spacetime unvierse expansion, the origin of time, and the configuration of the spacetime universe in the context of Big Impact Theory. With some ideas of what these things are, it would be easier for the layman readers to understand the Big Impact Theory which is to be introduced.  I encourage readers to throw in  ideas so that I know they are still with me and are not lost. If you just keep reading without asking questions, it is either you are confused or you are complacent with where you are. I need readers to understand as much as what I say (so I would try to avoid using difficult terms) so as to understand in a much deeper level of what they should do in future.  Your mission is same as mine, don't think that it is my mission and not yours. Most scientists are working hard to reveal secrets of universe everyday, so they are our hope. Yet they do not do it for free, they are either on high-paid jobs, or on  funded research projects , or for book writing (bringing in money) or for winning prizes.You also see that there is a lot of scientists who claim themeselves religious. If they are really religious, they would think  that studying science is only for making a living because as I have said before, it is meaningless for a created item to study other created systems.  If they are curious about the universe, then they should not bar themselves with religions. So  most scientists and common people, despite their apparant religious piety, in fact reserve some doubt in their heart about the truth of their religions. Eventually most of them have become actually atheists unknowingly. This is the dilemma that almost everyone in this world is facing. While they do not rule out existence of God or supernatural powers, they do not really rely on them, they appreciate that science can bring them more reliable effects. If you are one of them, I would advise you that either you disprove the Mission Theory (but with  convincing counter evidence) or to accept it and go in that direction, or to bring out a new theory . The most unaccpetable way is just stand aside and wait in doubt ....until end of the life. So tell yourself :Don't become a deserter or a Big Pest. 

Well, let us  first discuss about Time. There are several ways to see time, biologically, cosmically, or in consideration of  entropy; some cosmologists even use imaginary time to describe the origin of time. What I am going  to discuss is the origin of time in the context of Big Impact Theory. How did time start? When did it begin? When will it end?

To simplify things, let us come back to the 2-tour bus crash metaphor we used previously. Imagine that there are 2 tour buses (representing the 2 opposite spiritual universes), one coming from LHS  ( for the anti spiritual universe )and one from RHS (for the spiritual universe )  respectively in opposite direction. They are supposed to meet in the Tunnel (vanish room) and vanish there. On the RHS, the universe is a 3-dimension universe (having co-orindates  x, y, z and unit orthogonal vectors i,j,k, meaning every spiritual inhabitant can be labeled at a spatial location  xi, yj, and zk, or simply x, y, z). On the LHS, the anti universe is a 3-dimension universe but with inverse co-ordinates (i.e. -xi, -yj, -zk for labeling every anti spatial spiritual inhabitant).  In fact, these 2 buses together with the passengers are the last ones of the remnant universes to pair to get vanishing. If they met in tempo and pace and properly in the tunnel, the renmant universes would totally disappear and vanish, and we would expect a new pair of opposite spiritual universes milling out from the tunnel. I repeat : on the RHS, there is a 3-dimension domain, and a 3-dimension bus( universe)  is approaching the short tunnel , while on the LHS, there is a 3-dimension domain (inverse co-ordinate axes) and there is a 3-dimension  bus (anti-universe) approaching the short tunnel.  Now the RHS universe  holds the horse (bus) because the driver and /or passengers inside (some or all)  suddendly change the mind and do not want to vanish soon. The  sudden braking causes a chaos resulting in a resuffle of the order of the passengers (i.e. instead of   passenger a, b, c,... n, it becomes n...b, a,..,  for instance) plus some torsion and strain . The LHS anti universe together with the inhabitants (bus and passengers) however proceeds to reach the tunnel ;without meeting the proper counterpart, it passes through the tunnel and emerges from the other end into the RHS 3-dimension domain. As this domain does not belong to it, the anti universe transforms its co-ordinate axes into a peculiar vector, Time. Its inhabitants (anti-spatial spirits) also transform to become time spirits. Remember the 2 buses have not yet bumped, but the time vector has been in place.

So, before the bumping (The Big Impact), we have Time spirits (passengers) and Time vector on one  bus (the fast running one), and the spatial spirits (passengers) and spatial co-ordinate axes  on the other bus (the braked bus). That means time has existed before the Big Impact.  Then the two buses bump in the 3-dimension doman (outside the tunnel). The time vector and the other spatial co-ordinate axes merge to become a 4-dimension space-time universe ( there can be more than 4 dimensions but only 4 are significant). From then on, we label each point in the spacetime universe with (x,y,z, t) instead of just (x,y,z), and we call each point an "Event " , with x,y,z being the spatial co-ordinates, and t the time co-ordinate.

In the human world on the Earth planet, all matters and human beings move slowly (when compared with the speed of light), and they are also tightly bounded  gravitationally within this solar system. So an Event on Earth appears to be no different from a Location except that you must add a parameter called time (proper time, to be precise).  For example, Paul and John are supposed to meet at Whitehouse at 8:00hr today, but the meeting is postponed to 18:00hr this evening. We say that Paul and John will still meet at the same location (x,y,z) but at different time. However if we view Whitehouse as an Event in spacetime, then we say Paul and John did not meet at (x,y,z, 8hr), but will meet at Event (x,y,z, 18hr). These 2 Events are different.  If we represent the Whitehouse  between the 2 Events with a vertical line, then it traces this vertical line from a bottom point , the Event (x,y,z,8 hr)  and ends at Event (x,y,z, 18 hr).

The significant difference between locations  and events can be understood by considering an imaginary example.  Say a pair of twin sisters, Susan and Mary were born in 2000 at 0.00 hr at the Whitehouse  which we label with 4 co-ordinates (0,0,0,2000yr). Susan was then taken by a spaceship to fly to a distant Star and then would fly back to Earth sometime later. Mary however was raised in Whitehouse without travelling far. So Mary traces a vertical world line starting from Event A (0,0,0, 2000yr). Now  in 100 years according to Mary's clock, Mary will be at Event  C(0,0,0, 2100 yr). If at this Event C, Susan flies back and meets Mary, something strange would happen. According to Susan's clock (which is similar to Mary's being gift from Daddy), Susan has only been away for 30 years instead of 100 years. So Mary is 100 years old while Susan coming out from the  spaceship looks young as she is only 30 years old.  This is not purely scientific fiction, it has mathematical and scientific reasoning, and you can look for the rigorous answer by studying Einstein's Special Relativity. But in short, Susan has traced her own worldline (which is a composite one, comprising that worldline from Whitehouse to the distant star, and the the return worldline from the distant star to the Whitehouse), and her composite worldline happens to meet Mary's at the second Event C. Mary used 100 years (proper time according to Mary's clock) to reach that second Event C, but Susan used only 30 years ( proper time shown by Susan's clock). Why is there difference between these 2 proper times?  Before answering that question, we see from above example that there can be more than 1 path to link up two events in spacetime. Mary's worldline links up those two events A and C by a vertical line. It happens not to be the shortest, in fact it is the longest, so it consumes the longest time, i.e. proper time same as the cosmic time. On the other hand, Susan's composite world line (or a curve ABC) linking up the same 2 events (A&C) consumes much less time. Susan has been flying after departing the Whitehouse, and her movement in the spacetime (because of the spaceship) is of high speed, i.e.. a significant fraction of light speed.  Such acceleration and change in direction and decelaration etc. throughout her journey make Susan move in various Minkowski spaces. In each Minkowski space, the proper time (the clock time in that space) bears a different ratio with the cosmic time. To find out the total proper time along the composite worldline, one has to add up by integration all those small proper times. In general, when an object moves at high or relativistic speed, its proper time would be shorter than the cosmic time. The higher the speed, the shorter the proper time. In the above example, Susan's spaceship travelled for most time at 0.715 light speed. Mathematically speaking, if an object travels at light speed, it has no proper time, or it does not age. But in reality, not any massive particle can be accelerated to light speed.

In the above example, Susan only uses 30 years to look into the future of Mary's 100 year frame. Therefore in one sense, Susan takes a "Time machine" and flies to the future. But be cautious, Susan cannot take the same "Time machine" to go back to the past, e.g. back to when she (Susan) was 10 years old. The reason is if you want to go back to the past, you need to travel at a speed faster than light.  Look Susan's experience in Mary's 100 year frame is a real one and she can interact with Mary . If however the 30-year old Susan then took a faster-than-light -speed spaceship to go back to her own 10- year old time, Susan would only see her childhood but not be able to experience it again or to change any past happenings. She would only catch up with the images (photo effect) of what happened when she was 10 years old and see them as a bystander.

We have discussed more than necessary about Time. Now we turn to the configuration of  Spacetime Universe. It is not uncommon to hear people say that Universe or Spacetime Universe is of infinite size. What do you think of this? It seems true apparantly because even light cannot travel to the edge of  it, so it must be of infinite size. You are wrong if you share this view. The statement that "the universe is expanding" would be meaningless if the size of it was  infinitive or infinite. To construct the possible configuration of spacetime, we need to show that it has to fullfil the following conditions:-

a.there is no previleged observer in this spacetime universe

b.the total energy of the spacetime unvierse must remain conserved but non-zero

c.that the universe is not expanding at the speed of light

d.that the universe must have a finite size , but this size is changing

e. that the universe does not expand into already available spacetime or space.

Rather than taking pages to explain above conditions, I would straightly give you the configuration of spacetime universe in the context of Big Impact theory and then see how it meets the above conditions.

Imagine you have a flat (uninflated, different from deflated) rubber balloon that has some glued-on metal studs glittering on its surface. You then blow it up until it forms a small ball. Then each time you blow in air, the balloon swells a little, and the distances between the metal studs increase. You will notice that the metal studs close to each other have inter-distances increased relatively slowly, but the metal studs that are far away will have inter-distances increased faster. If you continue to blow, the balloon swells, and the radius of it increases gradually. This is analogous to expansion of spacetime universe if we consider the metal studs as galaxies or blackholes or as some spacetime structures, and the rubber skin as the energy shell . So before the balloon swells further, it takes up certain finite size with a certain radius which can be traced back to an imaginary centre. Inside the balloon, we have air, but in the spacetime universe, that is empty and void, having nothing and not even a single spirit.We call that region Inside Limbo(內苦海). What about outside the balloon? Of course we have air, but for the spacetime universe, outside it there is again nothing but the Outside Limbo(外苦海).

With this simplified picture of spacetime universe configuration, we can see how it fits into the requirement conditions. First, we can see that condition (d) and (e) are met with without the need for further explanation. As for condition (b), we can just consider the rubber material of the balloon as the energy (here we should use the term pristine energy ). So whatever size or radius of the balloon is, the amount of rubber material is same and unchanged, though the rubber skin would grow thinner and thinner as the balloon expands.  In terms of the spacetime universe, the pristine energy is conserved. This is the amount of energy pumped into the spacetime universe during the Big Impact. An equivalent  and opposite energy was pumped into the anti energy-shell universe, as part of the Creation Law of Zeroism. We shall come back to this in future. For now you just remember that energy is conserved at the" pristine" level but not the "convertible" level. This complies with condition (b) above.

So we are now left with condition (a) and condition (c) to meet with. We deal with condition (c) first. As all the spacetime matters (blackholes, stars, galaxies, dark mass, nebulae, all particles )are littered in small amount (as metal studs on the ballon surface) as debris on the spherical shell of the spacetime universe, we need to identify some regions as spacetime regions where these spacetime matters permanently stay or for long time would stay. The other regions which form most part of the spacetime universe shell are not spacetime regions but spatial regions.That means to say that in the spatial regions, there are no time spirits (free or entrapped). In these spatial regions, we have spatial spirits each taking a space  called spatial cell (house of a spatial spirit). Each spatial cell is haunted (or contaminatd) by a small amount of positive pristine energy (we call it positive because those in the anti-energy-shell universe would be called negative). It is because of this contamination, the spatial spirits (the hosts) are not free, i.e. each not a free spatial spirit. The spatial spirit cells are of minute size (comparable to the size of photon like particles), and I would explain why later. Contaminated Spatial spirits, unlike time spirits do not normally move and they are stagnant.

We know that all rays, lights and relativistic particles orginated from the spacetime regions, i.e. from all those debris. The earliest rays came from the spacetime particles first born as some kind of black body radiations.These rays radiated from the spacetime regions in all directions at light speed. When travelling in the spacetime regions which are relatively stable and bound and connected together gravitationally, the rays did not and do not undergo any red-shifting (i.e. frequency reduction or wave length increase) . When after some time, an unshifted photon reaches the edge and leaves a tightly bound galaxy or the like spacetime structure, and is heading towards another galaxy , the photon will enter an intergalactic spatial region (region between 2 big galaxies). As said before in this intergalactic spatial region, it is teeming with contamined spatial spiritual cells which we call Intergalactic Medium cells. What will happen to this photon when entering  these spatial medium cells? Remember I said somewhere before that all spacetime particles follow to some extent String Theory (see Toaist Thoughts, 恍兮惚兮...)and each elementary particle basically consists of a spatial spiritual cell  with an energy pack (pristine energy ) and two filaments and 2 time spirits?. For the sake of brevity, let us say each spacetime elementary particle  consists of just one spatial spiritual cell with some small trace of pristine energy and a time spirit attached with a filament. A photon hence can be considered a particle of that structure. What makes  a photon differ from the the other elementary particles is that the photon has a relatively long filament so long that it makes the time spirit moving for most of the time almost unreined. When the filament of an elementary particle is short (below a certain critical limit, I call it Zheng's filament length), the pristine energy will manifest as mass, so the particle has a mass. The shorter the filament, the more massive the particle,  and the reverse is true. When the filament length exceeds a certain length, the particle exhibits wave characteristics and possesses a tiny mass. When the filament length exceeds the Zheng's length , the particle becoms massless, and the particle exhibits wave characteristics (relativistic) and the pristine energy manifests as convertible energy pack. For example a photon has no mass, but a convertible energy of hν (h =Planck's constant, ν=frequency) value. In a massive particle, the time spirit always tries to escape from the bond and streches the filament which then slows down the time spirit and eventually pulls it back to the spatial spiritual cell (like a stretched spring). But it does not stop the time spirit to try to escape again. Thus the massive particle oscillates. Similarly a composite particle (such as a proton, an atom) oscillates. Each time the time spirit of an elementary particle retreats (or bounces back), a record is made in the memory of the spiritual spatial cell. This is time record, or it means all massive particles age, and therefore all massive particles decay (likewise for composite particles such as protons). But in the case of photons or photon-like particles, which are massless, they do not keep this record. Therefore they do not age. The reason is photon-like particles change their spatial spiritual cells continuously and their time spirits never return to the same old spatial spiritual cells. This means that the time spirit of a photon always pulls the filament and the pristine energy pack through the various spatial spiritual cells and always emerges as a new photon with a new cell or housing. This is the "Housing Shifting Theory or Principle", a theory  by me. This to some extent agrees with Dr. E.H. Dowdye Jr's "Extinction Shift Principle". Each time a photon takes on a new cell and emerges as a new photon, it does not memorize its past history. How can a new born baby have history? Therefore a photon unlike other massive particles, sees no proper time (having no clock).

Now back to the question: what would happen when a photon is about to enter an Intergalactic spatial spiritual medium region in order to travel to another galaxy? Well, if the intergalactic medium did not expand, then the photon would enter it without any frequency changed (i.e. non-shifted or unshifted). But the fact is the intergalactic medium expands with new spatial spiritual medium cells  added (on the spherical skin surface) coming from the under (inner layer, i.e the inner skin of the balloon rubber sheet) layer. These newly arrayed underlayer spiritual medium cells however would not shift the photons because they are already haunted (contaminated ) with an inkling of pristine energy. So the photon would simply pass through them, using the same "Housing Shifting Principle". Yet there are other uncontaminated minute spatial spiritual cells (small free spatial spirits)that fly from somewhere else (I would tell you later from where they come) to add to the expanding medium shell . So in the regions where the spatial regions are expanding, and where there are such added uncontaminated spatial spiritual cells, the photon when going through each of such uncontaminated cells will leave a little amount of pristine energy in each of them. This is because energy is required to fill newly made space, or newly made space requires energy to fill, otherwise there cannot be such existence of space. Therefore the photon will see its pristine energy continuously reduced when going through such expanding region. As pristine energy is being reduced, the filament length would be growing longer (because filament length reflects the state of pristine energy stored as mentioned above), and that means the convertible energy hν is being reduced too. Remember h is a constant (you cannot change a constant number), so that means the photon frequency ν is being reduced. If light travels with constant speed c in vacuum, and c=νλ ( where λ is the wave length, ν the frequency), then a photon (an energy particle travelling at light speed) will have relatively low frequency when the wave length is long, or a higher frequency when shorter wave length. It is known that among the visible lights (the spectrum of red, orange..... blue, violet rays), violet and blue rays have the highest frequencies and shortest wavelengths, while the red has the lowest frequency and longest wave length. Thus if a photon starts as a violet light photon before moving into the expanding intergalactic spatial spiritual medium regions, it would one day lose some energy enough to become a longer wave length photon (lower frequency) such as blue. Then after some longer journey it would reduce its frequency but increase its wave length to become green light photon, then to yellow, and would one day may become red light photon. For this reason, we say that a photon in an expanding spatial region would experience red-shifting (i.e. shifting towards the red end).

Look all photons (or rays) origintating from or leaving the space time regions (such as a galaxy) must only travel along the peripheral surface of the spherical shell, i.e. they cannot radiate radially outward from the surface. This is because that all relativistic particles can only travel along big circles (geodesics, similar to the equator, meridians, a result  of GR). That means to say all photons must travel through the expanding spatial medium regions and would undergo red-shifting in these regions. As the spacetime universal shell is not expanding radially at light speed, this answers condition "c" above. What is left is only condition "a" to be complied with.

Let me at this juncture point out that in the above explanation of red-shifting紅移, I made use of Big Impact Theory which includes the roles of spirits. But traditionally, physicists only revert to Doppler's effects to explain the phenomenon. This is a case of using an effect and not a cause to explain a phenomenon and therefore it is not very complete, leaving some questions unanswered: Where is the lost energy of the red-shifted photons, and what will be the final fate of a continuously red-shifted photon? In my explanation above, the lost energy is given to the newly emerged uncontaminated spiritual medium cells. As for the final fate, I would reserve it for you to find out from the Big Impact Theory later. This lends support to my eariler assertion: physics and cosmology must be rewritten to include the roles of the spirits.

Anyway it is appropiate to tell you what is the current fate of photons that were produced around 13.7 billion years ago (when the spacetime universe was born according to Big Bang Theory).They started as black body radiations from extremely hot spacetime particles (at temperature billion billion billions deg. Celcius ) and were of very very small wave length and extremely high frequency. After so many years of travelling in expanding spatial regions, they have been red-shifted very much. In fact they are no longer gamma rays , or ultra violet lights or visible lights. They have now become microwaves of long wave length. Also the photon temperature has been reduced to about 2.728 deg.K (- 270.272 deg.C). These microwaves now form the cosmic background of the spacetime universe. By tracing backward the history of the microwaves, scientists manage to calculate with some accuracy the birthday of the spacetime universe. That is the most amazing contribution made by Big Bang Theory. Yet this however should not be over emphasized to make Big Bang Theory 100% credible..

Now we are to deal with condition "a" which is to be complied with : there is no privileged observer in this spacetime universe. Recall that the so called space time universe is restricted to the spherical shell only. What about an observer placed in the imaginary centre?  Would  he see the whole spacetime universe expanding away from him with him as the centre? That privilege can never happen. First the imaginary centre never exists. Second lights or other wave like matters do not exist in the Inside Limbo, so the observer even placed there would not see anything. So observers can only be placed on the spherical shell surface. Consider three observers on the spacetime universal shell, observer A in Galaxy A, observer B in a far away Galaxy B, Observer C in a spatial spiritual medium region C. Suppose they are immortal and they have been there since the birth of the spacetime universe. Let us check what universe would be seen by each of them.

For observer A, we suppose he saw the universe evolve around him and then the galaxy was formed where he was. But at any time, he could not and cannot see the whole spacetime universe. He could only see part of it ( Imagine an ant on a baloon, it can only see some distance around it but not the whole baloon). We call what could be seen  the "Observable Universe". If we drew a circle with centre at observer A, radius P on the balloon (here means the spacetime universe)  when the Spacetime universe was very young (baby), and we put some ants (here we consider them as photons or rays) inside the circle P. We assume that the ants can only travel in straight lines. The ants would be observed to travel in all directions, some go outside the circle, some crawl towards the observer A. If we stop blowing the baloon, i.e. assuming the spacetime universe is not expanding, you can see that those ants (rays) that are close to A would reach A first, followed by those farther away. Suppose that circle P is very big, those ants that started from the circumference (i.e. radius P from A) are still on the journey coming towards A. So in the eyes of observer A, he first saw rays that started close to him, then some years later, he saw rays which started half way (1/2P) from it, but he is still waiting to see those rays that started full way P from him. Therefore he would see stars from galaxies close to him, and then he would see the more distant ones as time goes by. Mathematically he would expect to see a star which is at distance M ly (lightyear, the distance travelled by light in a static vacuum in 1 year time) away from him in M years. Thus theoretically, he would see the whole universe shell (i.e. if he stands on the North Pole of the spacetime universe shell, the light from the South pole stars would travel along the shell in big circles and would reach immortal observer A one day). So when the lights coming from all directions from the South Pole reach the eyes of Observer A, he would see the South Polar Stars in all directions . That would be spectacular. Likewise, a fire set up by the Observer A would radiate lights that would travel in the unexpanding spacetime universe and would one day (after many many years provided the lights are not abosbed by matters in the journey) reach the South Pole and be watched by an observer there in all directions. The lights radiating from A's fire travel at light speed and would in 1 year reaches a circumference of a circle  of radius 1 ly  (circle with A as centre), and radius N ly in N years and so on. So if the fire was lit just on the birthday (assumed 13.7 billions years ago) of the Spacetime universe, today the radiation lights would have reached a distance of 13.7 billion ly away from A. We call that radius the Hubble Radius of A's observable universe. So in theory, likewise the lights originating from  a  circumference of distance 13.7billion ly on that birthday would today have arrived at A's eyes. Now let me introduce a term, the Particle Horizon defined as the farthest distance A can see (receive photons from that far region. which is a circumference) at a certain time. It is evident that both the Hubble Radius and the Particle Horizon are changing every second, and the Hubble Radius (a radius) is equal to Particle Horizon (distance to that farthest circumference) in A's observable universe. So in a static spacetime universe (i.e. not expanding), the Hubble Radius and the Particle Horizon would grow with time till each would cover the whole spacetime universe, and we would see every star in the whole spacetime as long as it is burning .In that scenario, the sky would be as bright as the night..

But it has been confirmed that the spacetime universe is ever expanding, so both the Particle Horizon and the Hubble Radius will never cover the whole universe. So there must be a maximum radius that the Hubble Radius cannot go beyond whatever the time, and there must be a maximum Particle Horizon Radius beyond which the light cannot reach observer A no matter how long he can wait. Because the universe is expanding in the spatial regions, so lights or waves  entering those regions have to travel extra miles in order to get to the destination. So an originally M ly distance of separation now takes more than M years to travel . But if the expansion is such that the photons cannot catch up with, then the photons cannot reach that place for ever. This is analogous to a kid running up a descending escalator. If the kid is slow , it cannot run up to the top and may even descend too. Even it manages to get to the top, it spends extra time to do so. So if observer A is omnipotent and immortal, and he drew the circle  of radius P (he determined the distance by co-ordinates beforehand) when the spacetime time universe was young, such that only those stars and galaxies that developed and formed later within this expanding radius P would send lights to reach his eyes in future, or that means those beyond radius P would never reach his eyes. If observer B is within this circle, A will see B and B will see A some day. If B is on the circumference (still within the circle), then they would still see each other in some very distant future (but the rays should have been so red shifted that A & B would have to detect each other with some form of longwave telescope). If B is outside the circle, B and A will never know existence of the other party. It can be concluded that P represents the maximum radius of Particle Horizon of A's observable universe, and this radius will remain unchanged (in terms of co-ordinates)  till end of the universe. Hence, our today's particle horizon is not yet the maximum one(ultimate particle horizon), it will grow with the Hubble radius as time goes by. That means we shall see more and more deeper into the universe in future. But would Hubble radius grow without limit? The answer is no, it shall grow to the same size as the  ultimate  Particle Horizon by similar reasoning. That is, the Maximum Hubble Radius will equal in magniture to the Ultimate Particle Horizon for a particular or any observer. Now you begin to think that a photon starting from observer A will lose energy to the medium and will lose all its energy when it reaches the Maximum Hubble Radius beyond which it cannot go. So does it die? How come a photon die?  You will find the answer in the Big Impact Theory. As for observer B, he would have similar situation as observer A who is only arbitrary.  Therefore none of them is privileged. If B is outside A's ultimate particle horizon, then A&B are both causually disconnected (i.e. a cause at B would not produce an effect at A, and vice versa). If A's and B's ultimate particle horizons overlap in some region,  those galaxies or stars in that common region would be seen by both A and B eventually.(though may not be at the same time). Now for observer C who is stationed in the spatial spiritual medium region which is expanding, he might be able to see some galaxies within his ultimate horizon or he might see nothing (no light) at all (if it happens to have no galaxies within his ultimate horizon). Afterall it is impossible to have a spacetime object (observer C) in the spatial spiritual medium region.

In cosmology theories , there are several spacetime universe expansion modes. There is one mode in which the Hubble radius  always equals to the particle horizon but this requires that vacuum energy density be present (known as the cosmological constant ). My model given above corresponds to that type of expansion mode, and the pristine energy density in the spatial spiritual medium regions corresponds to the vacuum energy density. This further supports the  validity of Big Impact Theory.

As I have promised, I would tell you where the uncontaminated spatial medium spirits come from. They continuously feed the expanding spatial medium regions, and they then get contaminated by the photon like particles that leave a trace of pristine energy in them so as to comply with the requirement that pristine energy requires space to store it and it in turn generates space . Where do these uncontaminated spatial medium spirits come from? The answer is: from black holes.  You will find more description about black holes and their functions in the Big Impact Theory. But in brief black hole is a region of high density of spacetime energy. When spacetime matters get close to it and enter its horizon, the time spirits and their energy filaments would be removed, only the spatial spirits together with the pristine energy contents can go in. Therefore inside the black hole, no time exists, and no mass exists (pristine energy does not manifest as mass). However with the time spirits and energy filaments circulating around it, a black hole appears  to the outside observers as a spacetime matter with spacetime mass. Let us see what happen to the spacetime matters (e.g. stellar matters) that is drawn into a black hole.  At first at the event horizon, the time spirits together with their filaments are removed from the elementary particles that make up such matters. These filaments and time spirits would be allowed to circulate in the Dead Time shell around the black hole. Then the remaining spatial spirits together with spatial cells and their pristine energy packs will move towards the centre of the black hole. Along the journey, the pristine energy contents will be squeezed out (because the high concentration of prinstine energy will attract the pristine energy pack strongly), leaving the minute spatial spirits and their cells free to move inside the black hole. As free though minute  spatial spirits, they will then choose to move out of the black hole by simply disappearing and re-emerging somewhere else. The most suitable place for the re-emergence happens to be the expanding intergalactic spatial medium regions where they re-emerge as uncontaminated minute  free spatial spirtual cells. So you can see,  physics breaks down at the Black Holes, and metaphysics takes over. The minute free spatial spirits regain their spiritual power and disappear inside a black hole to re- appear  somewhere else. With this reasoning, all the physicists' imaginations: the white holes and worm- holes that connect two universes can be disposed of.. That is, Big Impact Theory does not require singularities and such fictious objects to connect universes together. Big Impact theory however does not rule out existence of more than one universe (as there can be  3 pairs of other spiritual universes operating in the unperturbed way as allowed by Zeroism), but insists on only one spacetime universe together with its anti-energy-shell universe. As questioned and believed by a number of physicists, singularities in black holes are just mathematical products and are due to errors in choosing the co-ordinates. This is in agreement with Big Impact Theory.

It is therefore clear from above that Black holes serve at least two functions. One is is to help bind other galaxies together to form the spacetime regions (the stud clusters on the balloon). The other is to reprocess the spacetime matters swallowed and spit out the minute free spiritual cells( which then provide the empty cells for photons to lose energy to ) which then become new medium cells in the intergalactic spatial regions where expansion takes place. In this way Black holes play an important role to power the expansion of the spacetime universe.

An interesting question about spiritual medium cells: do they only exist in the intergalactic region? The answer is not simple. There are also spiritual medium cells in the spacetime region but they are not for the expansion purpose. For example they exist between stars , and celestial matters. These spiritual medium cells tend to accumulate around massive objects e.g. a star or a neutron star. The more massive the object, the more spiritual medium cells it gathers. Those that are close to the massive object are hence compressed by those on top of them. In general the closer to the surface of the massive object, the more compact the medium cells . That means to say, the prinstine energy density (energy per volume of the cell) of those compact medium cells are higher than those that are less compressed , i.e. those farther from the object. In this way, the medium cells trace the contours or shells (contours or shells of equal pristine energy density) around a massive star, and this is the distorted spacetime (as suggested in Einstein's GR). When very far away from star, the pristine energy density returns to normal and there are no energy contour lines. Consider two massive stars, each having its sets of contours around itself. When these 2 massive stars are very far away (forget for the time being all the galaxies and blackholes), their contours are separated by medium cells having normal pristine energy density in the vacuum. They  have no effect on each other.When they are brought closer and closer, there will come a time when their contours (can now be called gravitational fields) begin to touch. These 2 stars will immediately through the mediation of the spatial medium cells know the existence of each other. When brought further closer, the contours of each star will overlap and get distorted at certain points, that result of such distortion will manifest as a gravitational pull between these 2 stars and for convenience we say there is a gravitational force between them when actually it is a distortion of spacetime and not a force.

If gravity was a real force, then all stars would  attract one another no matter how far they are away from one another, and no matter how small those attractional forces are (which would be far reaching). In that case, one wonders why all stars and black holes would not have already merged together in these 13.7 billion years.

To illustrate how the spacetime distortion is related to gravity, we take a photon for consideration. From the previous discussion, we learn that when a photon travels in expanding medium region, it loses its pristine energy to the uncontaminated medium cells. So it can be deduced that when a photon changes its cell of pristine energy density to a cell of less pristine energy density , the photon will lose pristine energy and becomes red-shifted. The reverse should be true, i.e. when it commutes from a cell of less pristine energy density to a cell of higher pristine energy density, it gains energy and becomes blue-shifted. With this principle, then it is easy to explain the gravitational red shifting when a photon leaves a star and gravitational blue shifting when a photon approaches a star.

In picture 2, Star A is shown to have a  set of pristine energy density contours around it,and for simplicity, we divide the gravitational field into just 4 annulars, a, b, c, d (which in fact are made up of billions and billions of pristine energy density shells) such that a has the greatest pristine energy density, and c  the least energy density.  Similarly for a star B in the same galaxy, it has density regions d,e,f.  In between these 2 stars, we have a normal (or average) pristine energy density in region  n (which is determined mainly by the black holes in the galaxy, but for the time being, we just say it is uniform energy density region ). To photons all these pristine energy density regions form different media of different refraction indices, so we expect the course of a photon passing through these regions would be bent ( refracted). A photon starting from point R of star A's surface and going out radially along path RFGH will suffer red-shifting and lose energy. After leaving the gravitational field, it keeps its course in interstellar medium region  n which has a normal (average which is mainly determined by the dominating black holes in that galaxy)  pristine energy density . In that region, there will not be any red or blue shifting. When approaching star B, it takes a radial path JKLM, dipping from a less energy denisty region into a denser region. It continues to gain energy and  is blue shifted until it hits the star B's surface at point M where it will be thermalized with other emitting photons.  Now consider another photon starting from point P of star A. It emerges with red shifting from the gravitational field of star A and enters the normal density region n in which there will be no shifting. Then it hits the outermost contour of the gravitational field of star B and is blue shifted due to gain in energy. Being not radially in bound, the photon hits the field with an incidence angle, and is then refracted (Snell's law) in the denser  region below. This bends the photon path towards the star B centre. But when the photon begins to hit a less dense contour region, its angle of refraction becomes bigger than the angle of incidence and this bends the path as shown. At the same time, the photon loses its gained energy . As a result it eventually re-emerges from the gravitation field of star B and leaves with a bent course and no gain or loss of energy.  If the photon is intercepted by an observer M (e.g on Earth planet), this photon (and the other coming photons along this ray) will appear to come from an image star A' (as indicated by the dotted line). Therefore the observer will see the image of A' coming along the deflected ray. If we consider B as the Sun, M as an observer on the planet Earth, A as a star, then when M is between A and B (night time), the observer M can see A direct. But at day time when M faces the brilliant sun B, M cannot see the deflected image A'. However in the full Solar Eclipse, M may see the image A'. So by comparing the position of star A at night time with  that of the image A' during full Solar Eclipse (of course by taking photographs), the scientists can determine the angle of deflection of a photon due to the solar gravitational field.  Thanks to the total Solar Eclipse in last century, scientists were able to find that the angle of deflection was close to what Einstein's General Relativity Theory predicted, and not that what Newton's physics (which considers gravity as a force) predicted. GRT asserts that gravity is not a force but a distortion of spacetime. Yet there is no simple way to explain and visualise the distortion of spacetime. Big Impact theory which incorporates the  spiritual ingredients in physics now can explain the picture as above in a simple language.  Now the bending of light by the presence of a massive body B enables a suitably positioned observer M to see some stars behind that the massisve body. If that massive body B is a black hole or a dark mass, the observer may be able to see stars (e.g.A) behind it ,which seems not possible in the first place. The projected image of the star or stars can be more than one, the images can be scattered around the outside of the black hole or dark mass (i.e. the image can be on LHS, also on RHS, on top side and on bottom side). So if a star group suddenly has more than one image, we may conclude that there is a passing by dark mass in between. If the star group has more than one image for long long time ever since it has been spotted, then it may be possible it is behind a black hole. In fact, we are using the black holes and dark masses as some kind of Gravitational Lens to read some stars behind them. The variation of pristine energy density radially from a massive body be it a star, blackhole, planet, and even a simple basket ball is the cause that makes a falling object (e.g. basket ball) accelerate /decelarate when approaching /leaving a celestial body  (e.g. Earth) as if it was acted on by a gravitational force. But I am not going to explain it here, leaving it to be studied in  the Big Impact Theory . The other places where medium spatial cells exist are the sub-atomic  region , inter-elementary particle  and inter-atomic regions.

 What prompts us to think of spiritual medium can be illustrated with an atomic example. If a hydrogen atom is magnified to size of 1 km in diameter, then the proton will take a diameter of 10cm in the middle as the nucleus, and the orbiting electron the size of 0.01mm. So the atom  is a hoax because spacetime matters only take up very tiny volume in that  "big" atom volume. What  is between the proton and the electron? If we say it is empty, then how can the electron acknowledge the exisitence of the proton that keeps it in orbit. Despite the various invented fields by physicists, it is hardly convincing that the region is void and empty. Yes  according to Big Impact Theory there are the spatial spiritual medium cells whose stored pristine energy is not detectable by any spactime matter tools. It is believed according to Big Impact Theory that the minute spatial spiritual medium cells combine together and can be considered as one big cell with a spread-out pristine energy so that the pristine energy density varies very little in the big cell (the average density should be the same background one prevailing in that region. For example, if the atom is on the Earth surface, then the background energy density should be that on the Earth surface). Near the nucleus, because of the gravitational field of the proton nucleus, the pristine energy density is high. Similarly near the orbiting electron, its gravitational field also makes the pristine energy density high. When the atom is  in ground state, the electron orbits around the single proton nucleus and is bound  to the proton by the Coulomb force between them. The gravitational field of each particle does not touch each other and hence no gravitational force excists between them. The coulomb force attraction is mediated by the exchange of bosons via the big spiritual medium cell in between. When a photon of appropiate energy intrudes into the unexcited atom, it lingers in the big medium cell, raising the pristine energy density of some part of the medium cell. The orbiting electron interprets the sudden increase of the cell's prinstine energy density as the proximity of a nearby massive object (i.e. gravitational field of another object is felt). Worrying that it might be sucked into the graviational field of another object, the orbiting electron resists such sucking by increasing its orbiting speed , i.e. using centrifugal force to balance the sucking gravitational force. As a result  kinetic energy of the electron  is increased or the atom has been excited. After  a characteristic photon is emitted or leaves the atom, the medium cell's pristine energy density reduces and returns to normal (as before the excitation). The orbiting electron interprets it as that the other gravitational object has left,  it then reduces the orbiting speed back to same as before. In this way, the atom returns to ground state again. Of course if the intruding photon is powerful enough, it may excite the electron to a very high speed of orbiting, and the kinetic energy of the electron becomes so big that it  simply escapes from the atom. In that case, we call that the atom has been ionized. The amount of kinetic energy the electron can pick up needs to be quantized because of the quantized variation of the pristine energy density in certain region and this can give rise to various stationary energy levels of the electron. Though the gravities of the electron and proton do not play any part when then atom is in ground state, they do play an important part in explaining the excitation of the atom. This hypothesis can be extended to cover other complex atoms , only with some kind of suitable alterations and corrections.

The next thing we want to discuss is "where is the negative universe or the anti-energy shell universe? " .In fact other than the Big Impact Theory, there are some theories which advocate that universes exist in pairs.  In Big Impact Theory, we say that spacetime universe has a partner which has pristine energy  opposite in polarity so that the overall pristine energy of these 2 universes has an algebraic sum zero. What the Big Impact Theory envisions is an anti- energy spherical shell filled with only spatial spirits and negative pristine energy. The thickness  of the shell is extremely small. As a result the anti universe (or negative universe or the anti energy shell universe) is of extremely large diameter. That is to say, given an amount of negative pristine energy as much as the positive energy of the spacetime universe, it is spread over a very large spherical shell of extremely small thinness. It is evident that this negative energy shell must be many many times as large as the spacetime unvierse in diameter. Now we can more or less figure out where that negative universe is. It is a big big spherical shell encircling the relatively small spacetime universe at the centre. In between the negative universe and the positive universe (the spacetime universe) is the Outside Limbo where nothing (not even space and time or any spirits)exists. The spacetime universe is expanding in all direction towards the negative universe. No body knows when that spacetime universe can expand to that size of the negative universe and get vanishing, but it must be not less than 66 billion years. So you now know why it is necessary to study the spacetime universe to find out if there is a way to speed up that expansion rate safely. A lot of papers can be written on the subject and we would touch this topic again when we review the various buddhist hypotheses (still remember them?).

Now it becomes clearer and clearer who we are. We are the free spirits. But what type of free spirit? We are the free temporal (time) sprits. Why not the free spatial spirits? Recall the traffic accident metaphor, the temporal spirits came out of the tunnel from the left hand side. They bumped into the spatial spirit remnant universe. According to the Big Impact Theory, despite the chaos, some temporal spirits and spatial spirits got the right pairing and vanished, so a local Zero was formed. The local (i.e. not global) Zero condition caused a local creation (according to the Creation Law of Zeroism). This time the creation because of  the surrounding changing conditions caused  birth of  two equal and opposite groups of energy (the positive and negative pristine energy respectively).These energy groups required space for storage, therefore the negative energy took away some spatial spirits to the very far remote region and stretched the taken spatial spirits until it was no longer possible and the anti-energy shell universe was formed. The positive energy filled the twisted spirit pairs (temporal and spatial spirits entwined together) and glued them together. Such a sudden energy filling caused an inflation inside the spatial cells. Not only the twisted spirit pairs but some other spatial spirits were also filled with the positive energy. On the other hand free temporal spirits do not provide any spatial cells and  were  therefore not filled with the positive energy. The process was a complicated one. The net result is that those free temporal spirits (unhurt or untrapped) remain free . It is these free temporal spirits that have been contemplating ways to save those trapped spirits (spatial or temporal). It can be seen that there are more temporal spirits than spatial spirits in the spacetime universe and the latter is moving. The anti-energy shell universe on the other hand is static because there are no temporal spirits there.

With the simple picture about the confirguration of the spacetime universe and the anti-energy shell universe, it is not difficult to understand why the spacetime universe is expanding. It wants to expand to meet its opposite partner . That means to say even without the interference from the free temporal spirits, the Total Vanishing (Big Reunion) will come one day  though it will take a very very very long time. It can be hundreds of billion years, no body knows. Yet with the intentional interference from the temporal spirits, such Total Vanishing may come much earlier.

The next thing I would like to touch is the anti matters or anti particles. It is tempting to think that anti-particles exist in the negative universe. It is wrong. They do not exist there, but in the spacetime universe.  Dirac equation implies that anti particles exist as likely as the particles. Experiments in laboratories have confirmed their existence too. But why are they not found in real life? According to Big Impact Theory, the anti particles go hand in hand with the particles but we usually see the side that only shows the particles and not the particles. This is in big contrast to today's generally believed baryon-anti-baryon asymmetry. The latter theory suggests that there was somehow an asymmetry in the production of baryons and anti baryons in the early high-temperature universe. Yet no one has ever asked this question: Where did temperature come from? What is temperature? When was temperature born? Why  was there  very high temperature, billion billion billion billion degree K, and not  very low temperature, billion degree K below 0K? All these questions hold the key to the mystery of anti-particles. In particle physics, anti particles are supposed to move along negative time direction (i.e. back to the past). This is uncomprehensible. Personally I consider that is only a mathematical misinterpretation.  In Big Impact Theory, particles and anti particles are identified by the temperature of the pristine energies associated with them. In short, those particles having pristine energies above absolute zero are hot particles or particles; those of sub-absolute zero temperature are anti-particles. That means to say, in the laboratory or particle colliders, anti particles are not produced or generated. They are only there briefly because some particles have been turned inside out to expose the normally concealed anti particles. We shall discuss these more in detail in the Big Impact Theory

On the topic of Blackholes, there are  a lot of unknowns about them. One may ask a question: If black holes are formed from collapsed stars, why black holes could be formed in such a relatively short time when we have many many stars still burning up in the sky? Why not most or all stars have become blackholes or at least neutron stars or drawf stars? Are blackholes made of baryonic matters or non-baryonic matters? I said in some previous paragraph that blackholes play an important role in letting the spacetime universe expand (according to Big Impact Theory). Then in the early young spacetime universe when there were no stars and hence no blackholes, how the expansion was powered? Was the expansion powered by something else or  was there no expansion at all? Big Bang Theory does not consider these facts and has never reckoned Black holes's role in the expansion of the spacetime universe. According to Big Impact Theory, besides the star- collapsed black holes whose formation needs separate discussion, there were primordial black holes that came into existence right after the birth of the spacetime universe. They are mostly spatial spirits holding a big amount of pristine energy.  Having no temporal spirits, they do not appear to have mass,  and they do not interact with other baryonic matters. But they do possess gravity. Those who are smart would immediately raise a question: why were these energy filled spatial spirits not taken to far away like their counter partners in the anti-energy shell universe? The answer rests with the fact that the stored pristine energies were not pure pristine energies. They are processed energies, being mixed a little bit with some tied up temporal spirits. According to Big Impact Theory, during the Big Beaming Epoch (mass gaining epoch), primitive photons ( different from the secondary photons) bestowed massess (that is why I said before the so called Higg's bosons did not exist) to different particles that had a temporal spirit with them. Some spatial spirits received these primitive photons only not to have any temporal spirits to manifest the masses. Therefore those spatial spirits while holding a lot of pristine energies from these primitive photons do not possess any mass though they are just attractive to spatial medium minute spirits as those massive objects or star-collapsed black holes. They became the primordial black holes. The primordial black holes without any active temporal spiritual parts are non-baryonic. They digested and are still digesting the spatial medium cells, i.e. by taking in the surrounding medium cells, squeezing out the pristine energy of them, and liberating the empty spatial spiritual cells which then escape (metaphysics) from the primodial blackholes and re-emerge as new uncontaminated spatial cells in the expanding intergalactic spatial regions, ready to extract energy from passing by photons. Nevertheless, these primordial black holes helped in the early stage to keep close together large amount of  spacetime matters which were very important in the subsequent development of stars and the galaxies , and then the galaxy clusters. They represent part of the dark energies in the spacetime universe, while the  star collapsed black holes ,despite their disassembled temporal and spatial parts are still part of the baryonic matters. But that does not yet answer the question why star collpased black holes could have been formed in such a relatively short time. This will be answered more in details in the Big Impact Theory. For the moment, let me give you some hints, the star collapsed black holes are very much related to the quasers. This has something to do with the nature of quasers. Some physicists suggest that they are active galaxies while some are skeptical ,but Big Impact Theory suggests something very different. Those who are desperate to know about the alternative suggestion should encourage their friends to visit the Big Impact Theory (maybe a website or may be my blog, I am not sure yet) when it is launched. But I need to know  if there are enthusiastic scientists actually  reading my blog.

In the course of studying the configuration of the spacetime universe, I mentioned that spacetime matters in an atom occupied only a very tiny volume . Despite this, in that tiny atom, the spacetime matters hold up most of the pristine energy. Yet spacetime matter atoms and hence spacetime matters are only litters (something inhomogenous) in the whole spacetime universe, with spatial medium cells taking up most of the volume and hence most of the pristine energy. The sum of spatial medium pristine energies represents over 90 percent of the total dark energy. There are dark and processed pristine energies being stored in primordial black holes and they probably make up the other 10% dark energy. As for dark matters, besides the star -collapsed black holes which interact with other baryonic matters ,  there are non-baryonic dark matters. Non-barionic dark matters refer to those mixed spirits that are not glued together by pristine energies but are beamed to gain mass.They outnumber the baryonic matters. In short, all the baryonic matters and energies in the spacetime universe is about 2% of the total positive pristine energy .

There is still one more issue that I need to discuss. It is symmetry. It is still an open discussion that symmetry is a property of the nature and its laws (here nature is used in the general sense without any reference to the Zeroism or Big Impact theory) . This is an ontological point of view favored by some religionists  such as the  Toaists. It is also the basic belief used in the development of Einstein's General Relativity and many cosmological theories and the Supersymmetry theory (a hopeful to modify the Standard Model to explain all particle structures). Yet there is reason to consider symmetry from the epistemological perspective. Not necessarily the nature is of symmetric configuration and obeys symmetric laws. There can be other absolute objects not visible to us. Whether symmetry is caused by a disturbance or breaking by an asymmetric cause or vice versa is still not conclusive. Yet with the  Big Impact Theory and Zeroism, we can describe the universes in a more precise way to avoid those speculative questions about symmetry. First before the Big Impact, we had the spiritual universe pairs. We suppose there should be 4 pairs of such positive- negative spiritual universe pairs so that there was a symmetry of group D3 (rotation in 3 dimension). Our spacetime universe came from one pair of them. In the context of our own ancestor spiritual universe pair (i.e. neglecting the other 3 pairs), we at least could claim a symmetry of rotational cylinder or cone before the Big Impact. The subsequently produced anti-energy shell universe (the negative universe) preserves a spherical symmetry. As for the spacetime universe, despite the inhomogenity on relatively small scale (compared with the vast size of the spacetime universe), it can still be considered isotropic and homogeneous. Yet this is far from full rotation symmetry, and our spacetime universe was built in with a number of asymmetries.  One thing evident is that the total number of time spirits (in unbroken spirit number) exceeds the total number of spatial spirits (also in unbroken spirit number). This is because a number of spatial spirits have been taken to the remote anti-energy shell universe, leaving equal number of unpaired  free time spirits in the spacetime universe. Some of the these free time spirits have condescended onto the Earth planet to explore the Mission (hence lives taking part in the worldly matters), while the others are circulating over the spacetime universe periphery to wait for the news. The always left-handedness (an asymmetry)of the electron neutrinos might be attributed to the spinning motion of the time spirits before and during the Big Impact. The asymmetry built by the sudden holding and braking of the spinning spatial spirit coach before the Big Impact might lead to  among others the  development  of electrical charges. In short, due to the Big Impact, there is not a global symmetry though local symmetries are possible. Therefore it is likely that many symmetry theories based on breaking of a global symmetry might be wrong or need to be modified.

Now let us return to the topics of studying the viability of the differenet hypotheses of the Buddist thought. One by one we consider them in the context of the spacetime universe plus its periphery, which is filled with various spacetime, temporal and spatial objects.

Hypothesis a)佛光普照, literally: The Buddha's light shines through the universe  

Imagine if we are able to kindle all celestial matters and spacetime matters so that they all burn and emit light (photons), theoretically a negative radiant pressure would be developed. This follows from the phenomenon that even the emission may appear to blow things appart, there is an inward force to pull the things inward. This is because that "Pressure Creates Gravity", an amazing result of Einstein's equation. Yet no one is sure of this interpretation and suppose we take it for true. Then despite the emitted photons, the whole universe would somehow contract and would eventually collapse to a giant black hole. Now there are two aspects to consider. Firstly, we know the blackhole has the function of squeezing out the pristine energies from the various spatial medium cells and also in breaking the spacetime matters into temporal spirits with energy filament ,and spatial spiritual cells. The latter would also be processed in the same way as the medium cells, releasing the free spatial spirits, while the filamented temporal spirits however would be left circulating around the blackholes. It appears therefore the negative radiant pressure would not help in making the spacetime universe vanish.

What about if the radiant pressure would make the spacetime universe expand? Well, if the spacetime universe would expand, then, it must be the light photons feeding the primodial blackholes and the star-collpased blackholes. Then the scenario would be similar to the blackholes-powered-the expansion model that we have discussed previously. This looks promising but it is subject to the questions:

i. how effective is this way?

ii. how to kindle all the celestial matters?

Hypothesis b)  苦海無涯,回頭是岸”- literally “There is no boundary in the sea of bitterness, it is better to go back and return to the shore”

If we assume that the time reverses (but not inverses), we means that time still flows in the forward direction except that we are travelling on the opposite return lane of the same road. So we expect to see that the spacetime universe contracts but not the replay of the past events. All the entropies would remain and new entropies would be generated. There is no way to make the spacetime universe vanish. Nevertheless, we would see that matters and energies would be packed together and might at one point ignite altogether.

Under the same hypothesis, we next consider the scenario where time inverses. By inversion we mean the time retreats rather than reverses. So the cosmic time is reducing. We expect to see a replay of occurrences (when the human phase is concerned). At the same time we would have our memories continuously removed and liveforms reduced from complex versions to simple ones and then to primitive cells and then to life ground zero. From then, only the free spirits (no lives) could witness the contraction the spacetime universe. The various forms of matters and energieis would go back to the most primitive ones, particles and anti particles appear again and then disappear. But can this contraction go back to the Big Impact moment? I am afraid it cannot. Because the pristine energy in the anti-energy-shell universe (or the negative universe, a spatial one) would not disappear unless and until the corresponding pristine energy in the spacetime universe vanishes. In the spacetime universe, no matter how you play around with the spatial spirits, time spirits, cosmic time, there is no direct way to destroy the pristine energy in it. So we proceed to

Hypothesis (c)慈航普渡,登彼岸. Litterally, to sail( across the sea of bitterness) en-masse with Mercy and to reach the opposite shore.

This appears to be what the spacetime universe is doing now: expanding to negotiate the Outside Limbo sea. The question are "Does it work? How soon can it achieve the Big Reunion with the anti-energy-shell universe?  To anwer the first question, we need to know the prerequisite conditions of the spacetime universe right before the Big Union. At that moment, we expect to see a spacetime universe shell teeming with low density prestine energy density spatial medium cells. These pristine energies should have no problem in pairing with those in the anti-energy shell universe and part of the pristine energies vanish. As for those blackholes, they are regions of high density of pristine energies, so they should also be able to annihilate with the negative pristine energies though it would take some times . Let us see if the spacetime universe can expand to the size that fits to a T with the negative universe. The latter is with extremely low pristine energy density. But the the spacetime universe if to have the same extremely low pristine energy density must have all its pristine energy contents evenly spread out. How can the high energy density regions like the black holes be spread out ?  This is equivalent in asking the question "How can these 2 universes get in touch?". On the surface, there is not a very good way to do that. But we must have faith in Zeroism, i.e. Zeroism can be perturbed but it can never be destroyed, it will restore itself though it might take a long time. I would discuss a possibly viable way in the Big Impact Theory.

So I have covered more or less the important aspects of Zeroism, the implications the perturbation of it, the necessity of restoring Zeroism and hence the emergency of the intrinsic mision. In the next chapter I shall discuss the birth of the of the universe which is a result of the Big Impact.

Chapter One: Zeroism, the basic laws of universes

Let me introduce a mathematical concept that can be used to explain the mechanism

of operation of the universe(s). It is called Zeroism.

Zeroism , an universe operation mechanism ,based on following assumptions:

a. Laws of Zeroism “零道

i). things come from nothing; (無中生有), example: 0= 3 -3 +10-10….

  Law i is the creation law

ii)all things (negative and positive) add up algebraically to nothing i.e. zero; things are created continuously in pairs and then destroyed in pairs (萬有歸無), example 5-5+a-a+…=0

  Law ii is the destructive law

iii) Creation comes and is followed by total destruction (週而復始)

   example: flowers bloom and then fade

  Law iii is the evolution law

iv) Creation and destruction follows each other non-stop and the cycles repeat and repeat endlessly(循還不息) example: faded flowers give rise to seeds and seeds one day grow up to open flowers .

  Law iv is the cyclic law, a maintenance law

b. Universes follow the Law of Zeroism, Universes should be borne in pairs and connected at one point in the expansion cycle and should be destroyed when each contracts towards that common point.

c. Before the existence of the present spacetime universe, all universes were principally 3-dimension type (other dimensions being not dominant) with 3 spatial co-ordinates only (no time co-ordinate. i.e. one universe to have positive 3-spatial co-ordinates , and the other partner to have 3 anti-spatial co-ordinates)

d. Each of these past universes was inhabited by spiritual bodies of various types.They were neither energies nor matters ( massless, no velocity limits, stretchable, and splittable), and they possessed a number of limbs. They had power of cognition and desires. Spiritual bodies carry desire and memory but no magic or supernatural power.

e. When a pair of the past universes met to vanish, all the spatial co-ordinates and

  the spatial spirits were coupled together with the correct limbs finding the correspondingly correct limbs of the partners, and they were destroyed in pairs according to the type meeting its counterpart at the meeting point (0,0,0) in the right tempo and pace following the Zeroism law. This is like a universe occupying the first quadrant (imagine the upper hemisphere of a sphere, x,y,z ) receding to the point (0,0,0) and meeting its receding negative counter part occupying the 7th quadrant(the lower hemisphere viewed from above, co-ordinates –x,-y,-z). While doing so, both universes spun about its own (or the common for both )axis that crosses the point (0,0,0) and each spun in opposite sense but in pace and tempo so that the right parties met in pairs. Once they meet in pace, they are locked and stop spinning and vanish.  Batches of these bundles of spirits from two opposite universes meet in pairs until all the batches vanish. (see fig.2.1)

........

f. Then the true zero will create another pair of opposite universes (each taking up different/opposite domain such as the first and seventh quadrants as above) which would grow and then recede to vanish again. The cycle repeats and repeats.

We shall make use of Zeroism and the above assumptions in the rest of this book to explore various issues.

Chapter Two:

Birth of the contemporary spacetime universe, The Big Impact Theory

 1. About 13.7 billion years ago, a principally 3-dimension spatial universe was vanishing together with an anti-spatial universe of equal dimension at the meeting point (0,0,0). Towards the end of the process, the last bundle of remaining spiritual inhabitants of the spatial universe suddenly desired to have a continued existence and hence halted the spinning and stopped advancing towards the meeting point, though already very close to it. However the anti-spatial universe and its inhabitants continued to spin past the meeting point (and hence into the positive3- spatial domain) and bumped (limbs against limbs) into the non-spinning spatial universe.(Hence Big Impact instead of Big Bang )

2. In the domain of the positive spatial universe (i.e. the first quadrant, x,y,z), the anti spatial co-ordinates emerged as a co-ordinate (which is now interpreted as a time co-ordinate), and joined the 3-spatial co-ordinates to become later (not yet) a principally 4-dimension spacetime universe. We shall talk more about the time co-ordinate later.

  3.The inhabitants of both remnant universes met in such a way that

  a)the central core parts were of right positive-negative types to create a localized true zero .

  b)other outer and outermost columns were locked in the wrong gears, i.e wrong limbs  against wrong limbs, wrong species against wrong types. We call these entangled spirits or mixed spirits (time spirits entangled with spatial spirits).

 c) some spirits (on the farther sides) of both remnant universes remain unmixed and free.

 4. Because of the creation capability (law no.1) of the Zeroism, the central true zero part gave birth to a pair of equal and opposite pristine energies made up as follows:-

a)part of the free spatial spirits were taken by one pristine energy (E-) to a very very far remoteness and stretched to become an anti-energy shell and the anti-energy was stored in the shell so that the spatial spirits were highly stretched (hence stressed, and should not be feeling comfortable).

This is to follow the principal that “an uncompressed energy requires a space to accommodate it (we shall see later that this type of pristine neutral energy is compressible to occupy little space in black holes) “. That anti-energy quantity depended on the size of the local true zero region, The diameter of the anti-energy shell also depended on the extensibility of the free spatial spirits, but should be in the order of multi-billions light years.

b) to balance that fixed amount of anti-energy( so as to add up to zero), a positive pristine energy (E+)filled the spacetime universe. This positive energy came in 2 forms, one form in cold pristine energy filament which glued (with cold energy filament) some of the mixed spirits to become cold particles (massless yet), and one form in hot pristine energy filament which glued (with hot energy filament) some of the mixed spirits to become hot particles (still massless).However because there were less spatial spirits than time spirits(because of the remote anti energy shell) in the spacetime universe, and because the 2 remnant universes did not meet in correct mesh and pace and their positions being displaced due to one was spinning and the other not, some hot particles spread themselves on certain cold particles to become “Apparently hot particle”

(c)The positive pristine energy (hot or cold)filament filled the mixed spirit mixtures in an abrupt way and caused the mixtures to glue together and swell up, i.e. inflate. It is the spatial housing (which a spatial spirit owns) that was inflated, this caused the spatial spirit to inflate too. As the entangled time spirit was attached to the spatial spirit by the entanglement and then the gluing bond, the time spirit also was inflated.

During the Inflation (which was only a spatial expansion, spacetime co-ordinates not yet in place), the particles increased their sizes and fought for spaces . In doing so, they squeezed themselves and broke up into small particles. After the short-interval inflation (Graceful Exit after the required amount of positive energy filling had completed), the spatial universe was full of inflated hot particles/cold particles/apparently hot particles (still massless),some unfilled mixed spirits, and some free spatial spirits and some free temporal spirits

d) In the early space, the abrupt inflation of so many massless particles caused some particles to squeeze into different shapes and most broke down into smaller particles (but retaining their structure as the unbroken ones, i.e. a small time spirit mixed with a small spatial spirit with a pristine energy filament ). But they were still very big in size. Through the mechanism of wall collision or other unknown processes, the energy of each inflated particle or bubble was re-distributed among smaller particles inside each bubble and at certain time, they broke down into many very small particles, cold or hot or apparently hot ones. All a sudden the space was filled with these small particles, non-inflated mixed spirits, and non-inflated free spirits (time and spatial) . The small cold/hot particles (massless)paired (they had no difficulty to find each other, being so close )to vanish to emit primitive photon particles .This was the Big Beaming epoch. These primitive particle photons unlike today's photons, were of super luminous speed . Each primitive particle photon PPP consisted of a group of time elements  tied to a group of spatial spirits which had in store some neutral energy, (i.e. energy made up of cold and hot pristine energy).  They developed negative radiant pressure that was meant to bring the spacetime universe back to collapse to liberate all the entangled spirits, and to revitalize the halted spinning of the remnant spatial universe , and could have carried out the total collapse had it not been for the apparently hot particles.  Because of the presence of the latter, there was no collapse. The apparently hot particles, without any proper pairing and vanishing, absorbed some of the primitive photons' energy (PPE) and have acquired masses since. In short, these primitive photon particles (distributed in a homogeneous pattern) through some mechanism (but not the legendary Higg's scalar bosons) bestowed the primitive photon energy pack (PPE) as mass to various particles.The PPE would partly rest on the energy filament (if the particle has filaments) and leave the remaining neutral energy( cold half and hot half) as an energy pack in the particle's housing. Those particles were:-

i) the remaining “apparently hot particles” which from then on became baryonic (the structure: hot filament energy covering up cold filament energy+ mixed spirit pairs + H/C pristine energy halves ,i.e. neutral energy pack NE,neutral in the sense half hot and half cold)

ii)the mixed (but neither hot nor cold energy glued, hence no energy filaments) spirits particles. These had been non-inflated (because no positive energy filling) but then inflated to break down on beaming to become non-baryonic particles. (structure: mixed spirits + H/C pristine energy mixture )These non-baryonic particles with mass formed part (may be or may not be the major part of the dark mass) of the spacetime universe (as we shall see later blackholes are also dark energy and dark mass)

iii)the unmixed free time spirits to become beamed (to distinguish them from their predecessors) temporal spirits. It has not been ruled out that a few time spirits with high spiritual speed may have escaped beaming and acquire no entropic debt.

iv) the unmixed free spatial spiritual particle (structure: free spatial spirit with space H/C pristine mixture energy . What about the superluminous time spirits? They though beamed did not take on any PPE and have still remained free time spirits).However the mechanism of bestowing masses to this group was not successful, because the PPE (primitive photon energy) found no mixed time spirit to act on to surrender the mass. Most spatial spirits acquired just some  neutral energy, and inflated only to break down into many many minute medium spatial spirits and store the neutral energy with them (a kind of dark energy having no mass characteristics). Imagine you have a glass bowl that is supposed to accept hot boiling water but is somehow broken by this temperature change when the super hot water is poured in. By similar reasoning, these minute neutral- energy filled medium spatial spirits then are no longer the same old free spatial spirits, and have since lost the freedom of desire. These minute medium spatial spirits permeate the universe (compare these to Einstein's once believed “ethers”) and tend to gather around massive bodies (to be formed later). They are responsible among others for providing media for light waves and gravitational waves (if any).They are field media (their fondness of gathering around massive matter bodies  gives the shape or contour of the matter bodies, hence curved spacetime even at a far spatial distance though with reduced effect). (note these are spatial field or medium cells in the spacetime regions, be cautious not to confuse them with those medium cells in the spatial regions to be introduced later. The difference lies in the type of energy contained therein: pure pristine energy in spatial region medium cells, and PPE in the spacetime region medium cells) Such shaping gives rise to the various phenomena when a photon beam travels towards or away from the matter bodies. These phenomena include gravitational blue/red shifting,and deflection. For non-relativistic traveling particles in the spacetime, they experience metric tensor changes (gravity) as they travel from an event to another event due to presence of the massive bodies. There are also minute spatial medium spirits (which must be understood to be those with PPE and not pure pristine energy inside) among elementary particles (i.e. sub-atomic regions and sub-composite particle regions). We shall see later how these minute medium spirits mediate the interactions between elementary particles.

There are however unmixed free spatial spirits that did not inflate very much and did not break up, and all together are holding up a lot of neutral (not purely pristine) energy of the primitive photon particles . Being stagnant (spatial spirit nature), these regions become primordial black-holes (having no mass, but big amount of neutral energy, not any free time spirits inside, and no time co-ordinate, ). The reason for unmixed spatial spirits receiving different amounts of primitive Photons' neutral energy is that they were of various concentration (inhomogeneous density) over the early universe during the Beaming Epoch. It is believed that there are some number of pairs of Primordial Black hole , each holding in its ambit some super clusters of galaxies. Being non-rotational and stagnant, and a neutral energy store, a primordial black hole is a dark energy centre and is not interacting with other matters. It has gravitational effect but not mass.(Structure, slightly inflated spatial spirits with space, and not purely pristine neutral energy)

e)  However there were some bubbles that were not completely broken down and their walls and relatively big fragments became massive topological defects (in theory, these are baryonic).These small and big fragments became seeding perturbations. But most big defective bodies (e.g. monopoles and cosmic strings) have  ( if they still exist. ) not  been seen in our particle horizon today. Either they have been totally consumed in the Tug of War (we shall come across it in below) or they are lurking outside our particle horizon. 

5. The spacetime universe (now no longer a spatial universe, because time has established as co-ordinate after the beaming epoch) after the mass- acquisition by various particles were filled with very hot particles (relativistic, because apparently hot -particles), dense mass regions of non-baryonic matters, beamed temporal spirits, beamed minute medium spatial spirits (holding small amount of  impure or pure pristine energy), and some massive and large topological -defect structures, primordial black holes (holding up big amount of dark impure pristine energy), and perhaps some force carrier bosons (we shall discuss bosons later).

So, we have a Radiation Background (similar to Big Bang's radiation era)  The hot particles, of various masses and sizes, were present in a relatively homogeneous density in the just formed spacetime universe, and being at very high temperature, became blackbodies, radiating secondary photons  (distinct from the primitive photons) of electromagnetic nature (and these radiations, red-shifted in an expanding spacetime, forms the cosmic microwave background today). This is the moment when physics were just formed, and when secondary photons were emitted from hot particles (with masses) as radiations. Of course physics evolve in the course of the Universe's development. Now the spacetime universe began to expand (due to relativistic particles and secondary photons travelling in all directions. It might not be correct to equate K.E to P.E of the particles and expect that one day all particles would move inward toward a centre for a total collapse. We shall see later how a photon ends its life without returning to the central vanishing point. But ever since, the total pristine energy in the spacetime universe has been conserved)

6. The anti-spatial coordinates combined to emerge to become today's time co-ordinate (leading the spacetime universe to expand ever after the inflation epoch, but the rate and mode of expansion is unknown, perhaps according to Einstein-de-sitter's radiation era model)

7. All the existing spirits, free, beamed, or trapped (mixed) were taken aback by all these sudden changes which they had never experienced before. They began to contemplate ways to liberate the trapped spirits (those in the anti-energy static shell, and those caught in the mixed -spirit particles of different nature).

 

to be continued(if you find the blog worth reading, please invite your friends to visit it. The Mission cannot be completed by just you and me! I note that there are about 5 daily regular visitors, that is encouraging , but many and many more are required before we can become a force to reshape the world which is about to disintegrate due to global warming bickering.The disappointing result in the recent Copenhagen Climate Change Conference speaks for itself.  So do your part, don't take reading this blog as some kind of entertainment. Unfortunately I do not see much response from readers, either they are not up to standard to understand what I say, or they are still skeptical. I am more prone to think they are not catching up with my notes. I deliberately made some logical mistakes but I did not see anyone coming out to point them out to me. I would also adivse readers to read over again my blog in case they miss any new insertions somewhere where I think appropiate . Look the global warming is threatening human race and time is running out

 

                                                            

引用(0)
下50個
  • 檢舉

    vilmah 2010-02-03 09:54

    第一次睇你blog,鐘意!                           ....................................................................................................
  • 檢舉

    mitchj 2010-01-27 13:50

    請繼續發表好文!加油加油加油!

                                                             .....................................................................................
  • 檢舉

    凱元 2010-01-21 18:18

    the best as always thanks                           ....................................................................................................
  • 檢舉

    怡如 2010-01-14 11:56

    工作,是愛的具體化~~~~努力吧!

                                     ..................................................
  • 檢舉

    judsonjenney 2009-11-30 06:55

    Beauty, unaccompanied by virtue, is as a flower without perfume.                                   ....................................................................................................
    檢舉

    harryzheng2009-12-01 15:54

    Look a flower has natural fragrance which is not from perfume.
  • 檢舉

    希綺 2009-11-27 07:31

    百發百中不是一試就成的。

                                     ..................................................
  • 檢舉

    石白石白 2009-11-21 07:02

    精彩的部落格 要繼續加油                            ....................................................................................................
    檢舉

    harryzheng2009-11-23 11:15

    I suppose you mean my blog is wonderful. Thank you. But you should do your part too.

  • 檢舉

    鄭鄭 LEON 2009-11-14 19:19

    super
    檢舉

    harryzheng2009-11-23 11:13

    Thank you. Any further comments
  • 檢舉

    白雪 2009-10-29 18:27

    初次拜訪,請多指教 ⊙_⊙
                                              
    檢舉

    harryzheng2009-10-29 18:39

    You need to ask questions or give comments, or else I can do nothing
  • 檢舉

    Elton 2009-10-28 11:55

    The creator has no responsibility to tell the purpose, the creator is the greatest and most powerful. You cannot surpass the creator, because you were made by the creator. The unknowns created by the creator provide motivational forces to humans. The purpose of the creator is creation including the creation of unknowns. Creation is the aim of humans, without creation existence is meaningless and dull. Why do humans exist in this world? Existence is better than nonexistence or nonbeing. Creation is better than nonbeing. Creation is fun and colorful, creating positive or negative energy.

  • 檢舉

    bewew 2009-10-28 04:45

    要持續更新下去喲!!期待~~

                                                 
  • 檢舉

    黑皮 2009-10-27 03:41

    路過~很有趣吶...

  • 檢舉

    Elton 2009-10-25 10:31

    After long-term meditation, I came to the conclusion that the origin of the universe, the size of the universe, and the origin of elements are perpetual unknowns provided by the unknown creator. The creator is almighty and controls everything. If you know who the creator is, the creator is not almighty. Since the creator produces elements that form humans, the power of the creator must exceed that of humans and the creator can exercise total control. I said before if you can prove the existence of soul, then I will believe in your spatial spirits. Creation is the aim of the creator and is also the aim of humans, without creation existence is meaningless.

    You said that an egg is a big cell. How is the big cell formed and by what components? The big cell could only be formed by elements that were created by the creator. The creator can activate all elements possibly through subtle energy to create things.

    Creation is the aim of the creator and is also the aim of humans. Without creation existence is meaningless.

    檢舉

    harryzheng2009-10-27 10:48

    If you pre-empt the debate with your "Creator creates every thing without the obligation to inform human beings of the purpose", and that there is no need to prove your belief,  then there is no room for debate.
  • 檢舉

    harryzheng2009-10-24 10:23

    Thanks for your encouragement, I hope I wont't fail you.
  • 檢舉

    Elton 2009-10-22 11:29

    If you know who the creator is, the creator will not be the creator. The creator has the utmost power. We do not know in what form the creator is. It is just the unknown. I had meditated for many years and I came to the conclusion that only the almighty unknown creator can create so many things. I know that you can hardly be convinced of my conclusion. You can continue your spatial spirits and I will continue mine. You said it was simpler to make an egg cell. Can you tell me how to make and by what components?

    檢舉

    harryzheng2009-10-24 10:21

    I believe a team work is a more realistic approach to the development of lives rather than the act of one single being called Creator. All spirits at hard work shape this world and it is unfair to attribute the results to just that unknown figure called Creator. You say you have meditated for years only to reach the conclusion that things are results of an unknown almighty creator, this is tantamount to saying that you have failed to find anything because before you did your meditation, there had been theologies about the Creator. Meditation is unscientific as there are no inputs yet you expect some output. I think an egg  is equivalent to a big cell. We all know that lives began from simple cell versions. In that sense I think I am right to say it is easy to make an egg than a hen.
  • 檢舉

    Elton 2009-10-21 13:45

    I mean it is in vain and a waste of time for any one to probe into the origin of the universe. Unknown is the creator and the creator is the unknown which is my personal idea. If you want to probe into the origin of the universe, you can do so. The existence of humans is not controlled by humans themselves, but by the creator of the universe. If you know the philosophy of the creator, humans will forever generate problems. Positive and negative energy will appear all the time. How big impact is formed? Can you find out the origin of the substances that form the great impact? There will be no answers. A chicken produces an egg and an egg produces a chicken. Which comes first? I do not believe in the spatial spirits, except that you can have substantial evidence to prove their existence.

    檢舉

    harryzheng2009-10-21 15:16

    What kind of being  would  you call the Creator? A Human or an energy body or a spiritual body. If you call it an energy, then it is probably a spacetime matter (according to Einstein), but that contradicts the statement" there is no spacetime until it is created". If you call it a spirtual body, then it must take up space (but not time since it does not age) or else it cannot be close to the spacetime universe. So you have no other choice but call it a spatial spirit. If there is one spatial spirit, there is no reason why there is just one (unique) and not others. This is by logical conjecture. Meanwhile on the question of egg or hen, this paradox is only for children and not for scientists. Biologically , it is simpler to make an egg (cell) then a complex organic moving body (hen). Have I answered you the question?
  • 檢舉

    Elton 2009-10-20 11:09

    I agree that universe has space and time factors. I am so foolish that I cannot understand your spatial spirits theory. I insist that no one can tell the origin of the universe. The existence of anything must be proved basing on scientific method. I believe that everything is affected by space and time. I believe that everything in the universe is changing and nothing is static. I do not know why you are so concerned about the so-called spatial spirits. Why do you not concern more about humans that are facing many imminent problems? I know that people want to probe into the mysteries of the universe, but some unknowns will never be known because they are not the creator of the universe. For instance, if I have a certain sum of money in my pocket and keep the sum as a secret, do you know how much it is? You can probe into the matter, but you are never sure of the exact answer because you are not the owner of the money.

    檢舉

    harryzheng2009-10-20 11:56

    O.K. even you insist that no one can tell the origin of the universe, then why you insist that it is the Creator who  has created the universe, which is an explanation of the origin of the universe? That is a contradiction. Why should we focus on the human problems? In fact humans in this world are to solve a problem (the so called Mission) and not to generate so many problems. The more you want to solve them, the more problems you generate. For example, the more handy the traffic system is, the more engaged  are the people in various unnecessary activities and hence people are less free and the environment more polluted. The example you raise about the sum of money in your pocket cannot be linked to the spacetime issue. The free spirits witnessed the big impact (the accident, and hence that wrekage spacetime universe)and they knew what had happened, they are now just desperate to find the ways to rescue those trapped .
  • 檢舉

    Elton 2009-10-17 20:37

    I think that spiritual inhabitants can only be your assumption. Are these spiritual inhabitants formed by electromagnetic waves? I can hardly imagine how you can jump to that conclusion. I am unable to prove the existence of soul, but I cannot rule out the possibility that it exists. If you can prove it to me the existence of soul, then I will totally believe in what you said regarding the spiritual inhabitants.

     

    檢舉

    harryzheng2009-10-19 11:30

    The existence of a spacetime universe is a fact. They why there was no universe before the birth of the spacetime universe? This is a simple straight forward question. The only possible sensible answer is there were  universes of other forms. But they were not spacetime type. They should be spatial type having no time. The inhabitants there could then be different from the spacetime- matter- based lives on this planet or in this spacetime univverse. Such inhabitants were not affected by time, and hence long-living. We call them spirits.
  • 檢舉

    Elton 2009-10-16 23:50

    You said that human beings existed for 3 million years. Did we evolve from monkeys or bacteria? If from bacteria, how was the first bacterium produced?

    Positive and negative energy also exist, even there are no humans. The creator’s interest is not simply concentrated on humans. The creator concentrates on the delicacy of the whole universe. Humans only occupy a small portion of the universe.

    What are spatial spirits? Where do they come from? Are they similar to what we call ghosts? Please explain them in simple terms. I am not sure whether the soul really exists or not, it is really difficult to prove its existence. I do not rule out the possibility that soul does exist. Radio waves permeate the air, but we cannot see them or feel them.

    檢舉

    harryzheng2009-10-17 11:32

    In fact all the questions raised by you have been answered in my blog details. In short, if you believe in Creator, there is no difficulty to accept  spiritual inhabitants who were accomodated in the spiritual universes before the birth of this spacetime universe. It was that traffic accident Big Impact(caused by greed) that has generated the spacetime universe (not a creation but a wreckage). Those free spirits (untrapped and unhurt) contrived ways to salvage their unlucky fellows (trapped and glued) but they  being spiritual could not  and cannot interfere with the spacetime universe matters which obey nothing but physics and cosmological rules. What they can do is to link the spacetime particles together in a certain pattern little by little and develop them into organic matters which eventually evolved into different simple and complex lives.That is why a monky (but not your spiritual Creator) can throw a banana and eat it . Free spirits build the organic bodies  and they get trainned and they are promoted to higher calibre and later become the learned spirits. These learned spirits can group together later to form a soul unit. One  soul unit for one simple life and perhaps 3 soul units for one monky. To be human beings, you may need 10 soul units to become the integral soul to drive a human body. An integral soul may disintegrate after the death of the person if they find that such grouping is non-productive  as that person did not cultivate himself . Therefore if you want to keep your integral soul intact after death, you need to go in the right direction (not those supertitious and misleading one) and cultivate continuously throughourt you life. Your soul can then make a come back to continue with the Mission until it is finished.

     

  • 檢舉

    Elton 2009-10-13 12:36

    You had better tell me the origin of the universe and the origin of elements. I do not think that I can find the answers in your blog. The creator has no responsibility to tell humans what the creator does with regard to the existence of planets. I do not agree that only positive energy is art. I do not advocate negative energy, but we also see art in negative energy. Without ugliness, beauty cannot stand out so conspicuously. Without wicked characters, the heroes cannot be brilliant and charismatic. Besides being interested in astronomy, people had better use more time to solve the imminent problems to save the drowning earth. People can contribute tremendous positive energy to the world by finding solutions to cancers, AIDS and other threatening diseases. I will no longer search for the origin of the universe or the origin of elements, because I know that I will never have those answers. I am not the creator. The unknown creator is the most powerful.

    檢舉

    harryzheng2009-10-16 11:46

    What you say are human issues, it seems you consider that without human beings, the universe would be meaningless . You seem to imply that positive and negative energies would not have been there if there were no human beings. Why don't you think of the time respect: human beings have only existed for 3 million years while the universe has been there for 13.7 billion years? What I am interested is the universe throughout the history and not just the recent 3 million years. Ultimate truth exists regardless of whether there are human beings or not. But you tend to rule out this objectivity.

    In simple terms, all the elementary parcles (hence the later elements) came from trapped time and spatial spirits, and  time came from the anti-spatial co-ordinates. You can find more description by reading the "2-tour bus collision" metaphor in my blog.

  • 檢舉

    Elton 2009-10-11 10:55

    You are right, all things and phenomena are generated by the creator. The creator generates elements, thus generating the universe and humans. Do not ask me to prove the existence of the creator. If you can tell me the origin of elements or the origin of the universe, then I can prove it to you that the creator does not exist. If you ask me why humans exist in this world or what the meaning of human existence is. Constant creation is the answer. Creation involves changes and processes. Creation is art. All things and phenomena start from nonexistence to existence.

    檢舉

    harryzheng2009-10-12 11:58

    I see no art at all. Most if not all human beings are greedy and self-fish and are harming the environment  If your positive energy theory is correct, why these positive energy has not yet worked?My blog has provided clues on how the basic elements came into this universe, what you need is patience to read it. All the questions I asked you have not been answered carefully or perhaps you did not know how to answer them. One cannot isolate oneself to just some kind of mental thinking in order to explain physics and cosmology. The so called answers drawn are nothing but guessworks. O.K. even guessworks can be contributive in kicking people to think in certain direction. But definitely guessworks cannot jump to the status of a theory without going through any careful construction and building bases.If there was a creator, ask him why  planet Venus has been left in such a desolate state and full of carbon dioxide. Is that part of his meaningless creations? Similar questions can be asked for the distant galaxies away from Milky Way.

  • 檢舉

    Elton 2009-10-09 20:13

    We will never know who the creator is, because the creator will not let us know and has no responsibility to tell the aims to us. The creator is the most powerful. The creator will create unknowns for us. Many things can be built basing on scientific theories and methods; but not all the phenomena can be solved by humans such as the origin of universe or the origin of elements etc. A human is only a piece of chess controlled by the creator. Human is rewarded by the creator for human performances during which resistances or obstacles are interlaid. I think that creation is the final aim of the creator and humans.

    檢舉

    harryzheng2009-10-10 10:35

    So you just "think" that creation is the final aim or the Creator. This is tautology similar to saying that " John's mother is a woman". Of course a creator is to create something or else he could not have been called the creator. The problem is it is you who attribute the existence of all the things in this world and universe including human lives to a figure's accomplishment and hence that figure is called Creator.
  • 檢舉

    Elton 2009-10-08 23:32

    I do not think that man can see and solve all things. Can you see the formation of the universe? Many things are only speculations. If man is so smart, why so many people still die of cancers? If man is so smart, why so many people still die from earthquakes? I know that you still do not believe that the creator is the most powerful. And you believe that man can solve all the problems by physics. The creator simply enjoys creations. Creations of whatever things are beautiful. The creator creates and controls everything. Man also enjoys creations, because creations are beautiful. If there are no creations, everything will become monotonous. That I win the match is a creation. That I build a piece of good furniture is a creation. That I find a good job is a creation. During the process of creation, we will meet resistances or have obstacles (possibly negative energy).

    檢舉

    harryzheng2009-10-09 10:35

    It is common sense that whenever something is made, there must be a reason. In the same manner, if the Creator created human beings, then he should have told them clearly the  purpose of existence or mission to fulfill. But your argument lacks these important factor. What you say are just assumptions and speculations.  On the other hand what scientists have found about the universe are based on experiments and theories and are definitely not speculations though there are still some unproven hypotheses. The pair of glass or lenses your are wearing in reading my blog is a result of study of optics and refractive materials. They are real and not speculations.
  • 檢舉

    Elton 2009-10-08 11:41

    Everything exists in the form of energy body. Every human is releasing energy all the time because of cell activity. If their words, actions and manners are beneficial to human existence, they are releasing positive energy. On the contrary, if their words, actions and manners are detrimental to the existence of humans, they are releasing negative energy. If you give money to your father, make him happy and take care of his health, which is a release of positive energy. If you treat your father badly, always want money from your father and do nothing to sustain your own living, which is a release of negative energy. Bad energy can become good energy, a bad boy can become a good boy and vice versa. I feel happy if others can feel happy and all people can live in harmony. I understand that I am only a piece of chess under the control of the creator. My goal in life is to create world happiness and harmony. I know that there will be resistances ahead, this is life created by the creator. My life is possessed and controlled by the creator. Creator creates things and phenomena through humans.

    Man must be rewarded by positive energy and resisted by negative energy, so that existence is meaningful.

     

    檢舉

    harryzheng2009-10-08 12:03

    You are too quick to ascribe to yourself the honor of being created by the Creator and your life is under control of the Creator. Who actually have seen that happen?You say you are a chess piece , then there must be only a few chess pieces in the beginning and everyday there must be many many chess pieces are created and added to the chess board. What kind of chess game is it? There are many many good guys and bad guys being added to the chess board everyday, so  the Creator seem enjoy seeing bad guys killing good guys and vice versa. If you call that is the meaning of life ( and meaningful), I am sorry I would not buy that idea.
  • 檢舉

    Elton 2009-10-06 23:22

    Positive and negative energy are required in the course of human evolution. They are the excitation energy that propels humans to go forward. Positive energy rewards humans and negative energy excites the humans to get rid of them in order to obtain  positive energy. Positive energy can be created, but negative energy is not a kind of creation, it is derived from absorption. Positive energy is beneficial to human existence and negative energy is detrimental to human existence. I stress again that humans are the pieces of chess under the control of the creator. The creator paints and decorates the earth through humans. It is illogical if you want to be a thief. Negative energy is not released intentionally, it is released because the positive energy is insufficient to suppress the negative energy. Somebody steals things because the positive energy of morality is not sufficient to suppress the negative energy in his brain or he is on the verge of death because of hunger (negative energy), the negative energy is so large that positive energy is suppressed.

    檢舉

    harryzheng2009-10-07 11:13

    To make your theory convincing, I would advise you to build a theory to

    a. explain how the energies are created and destroyed. You need to prove they are in balance or not in balance. You need to illustrate the properies or characteristics of each energy.

    b. explain  why these energies were created how these energies evolve

    c. explain how these energies can be linkd to human beings

    d. explain the criteria to distinguish the energies

    e. explain how human beings can continue to live on even though it is known that the Earth planet's climate is going todeteriorate to kill most human beings in about 100 years.

    At last, I do not agree that you should use "Action and Reaction are equal and opposite" as an example to illustrate the interaction of positive energy and negative energy. The above is a law in Newton's physics. While action and reaction exist in pairs, it is always that Action brings about the reaction and not the other way round. There is always a causative factor to be considered. Besides Action and reactions can only be applied as a physics law on  non-intelligent matters and objects but not on lives and deifinitely not human lives. Martial Art Taiji is famous of converting or dismissing a strong action (a punch from enemy) into something that is harmful to the actor himself. That is at least the action does not exist with the reaction at the same time.

  • 檢舉

    Elton 2009-10-06 00:25

    I do not find any word more suitable than the term relativity. So I borrow it to explain my theory. Negative energy or positive energy acts on each other. When you push something forward, there will be reaction to it. Humans have the motivation to exist because of the existence of negative and positive energy. Lacking either any of them will not give humans motivation to exist. You cannot simply have darkness, there must be whiteness. You feel something is hot, it is relative to coldness. I say something is heavy and it is relative to lightness. Humans are only the pieces of chess under the control of the creator, the creator is most powerful. So I am totally not surprised if there are things that humans do not know or problems that humans cannot solve. No one wants to have negative things, but negative things cannot be avoided. We only hope to reduce them to a minimum. Do you want your son to be a thief? I do not want my son to be a thief. Can you tell me which country has no thieves? We only want to reduce them to a minimum.

    檢舉

    harryzheng2009-10-06 12:31

    I know your point which has been repeated manytimes. But sorry that does not answer my question and remove my doubt about the so called positive and negative energy theory. There is no fixed criterion to tell which is positive and which is negative. The only thing that you seem to get a point  is that both positive and negative energy are necessary . If your son did not want to become a thief, I would not mind to become the thief if the role of a thief is absolutely necessary to bring out the roles and  merits of the policmen and judges in the course of human evolution.
  • 檢舉

    Elton 2009-10-02 23:31

    Negative energy is a motivation created by the creator to motivate humans, so they will keep on living and move forward. If there is no negative energy, human existence is meaningless. I said before that humans live in relativity. If there is no sadness, happiness will not exist.

    檢舉

    harryzheng2009-10-05 10:39

    I find that you again use the term Relativity in the wrong sense though I have reminded you before. You are now back to square one and there are no new elements  on your side added to the debate.  To conclude, you say that on one hand negative energy is necessary to keep human being moving forward (how forward? in what direction?), on the other hand, you say that human beings must reduce the negative energy. What a big ambiguity and contradiction! Perhaps you mean both good guys and bad guys are necessary, so whether one is a  bad guy or good guy, one is equally important and contributive in human history.
  • 檢舉

    Elton 2009-10-02 12:23

    I am curious why my feedback becomes the feedback of 逍遙樂.

    If your house is infested by a lot of insects (negative energy), will you leave them alone? If your house is on fire (negative energy attack), will you just sit there and do nothing? Negative energy is the momentum created by the creator, so that humans are given the momentum to move forward; otherwise their existence is meaningless and dull.

    檢舉

    harryzheng2009-10-02 12:44

    Wait a minute. What you say does not answer my question: why negative energy exists just as the positive energy if negative energy is something undesirable. You say they are in balance (and hence cannot be reduced or destroyed). Now why you say  it is linked to momentum (I told you before that you did not use the term momentum in the right sense) which is a product of velocity and mass. Again you are telling me some terms which are not understood and explicable.

  • 檢舉

    逍遙樂 2009-10-01 22:09

    I do not agree that there are no aims. Schools have aims. Teachers have aims. Parents have aims. Companies have aims. Government has aims. They all have positive aims to achieve their targets. I have aims too. Aims beneficial to humans are positive. Man will face resistances all the time, which is the momentum provided by the creator. During the release of positive energy, we always encounter negative energy. Parents bring up their children, they go through a lot of negative energy. Teachers teach students, they also meet a lot of negative energy. If positive energy is dominating, negative energy can be overcome or controlled.

     

    檢舉

    harryzheng2009-10-02 09:51

    It is nice to hear another voice other than Elton's. But can you explain as I asked why it is necessary to promote positive energy knowing that negative energy is always there not to be reduced by any possible way. You seem to disagree that negative energy is same in strength as the positive energy, but Elton says they are in balance. If the creator likes the positive energy (being benificial to the human existence as Elton claims), why did he create negative energy too?  Please do not avoid such questions, I need clear anwsers to them.

  • 檢舉

    Elton 2009-09-30 12:42

    Usually, there are two sides to matters. More car accidents, more new cars are required. More people die, more coffins will be sold. More people go to hospitals, more medicines will be required. More wars, more weapons will be sold. More people fall sick, more doctors will be required. All the preceding things are not welcome by people, because they are not beneficial to mankind. I do not want to see wars, do you want to see wars? Do you want to see the application of atomic bombs? I do not want to see. You are right that the generation of negative energy can bring about the generation of positive energy. For example, the Szechuen earthquakes bring about more stronger houses in the future. But we do not hope to see them happen again. I stress again that both positive and negative energy must be there for human existence. You know what happiness is because there is sadness. We live in a world of relativity and balance.

    檢舉

    harryzheng2009-09-30 14:04

    Yes, you have just come the conclusive point: if ever positive energy and negative energy exist, they must exist in pairs and there is no way to reduce either side . They need each other for existence and for a balance. So there is no point to try to promote the so called positive energy and there is no point to reduce the negative energy. So this theory is empty and useless: no way to achieve it, and there is no aim to achieve it, and there is even no sign to show which side is dorminant.
  • 檢舉

    Elton 2009-09-29 17:16

    Chinese culture has a good virtue, which is forgiveness. The Japanese soldiers had killed so many Chinese civilians during Japanese occupation in China. Do we have to kill the same number of Japanese in return to make a balance? We aim to reduce and abolish hatred among people. Of course, we remembered the facts and learnt from the facts, but taking revenge is pessimistic. Any conflicts among nations or people are detrimental to the existence of mankind. I said before that a policeman killing a ferocious thief is not issuing negative energy, though the act of killing is a form of negative energy release. A man will certainly and alternatively issue positive and negative energy during his lifetime. Negative energy will definitely exist in this world; otherwise we cannot distinguish the bad from the good. We hope that the negative energy can be reduced to a minimum only.

    檢舉

    harryzheng2009-09-29 17:50

    You seem not have caught my point of view: that the so called positive energy or negative energy is subject to interpretation by the mankind and not something existing per se. As such there is no way to tell which is positive energy and which is negative energy objectively. Forgiveness is something outside the scope. Incidentally while Japanese soldiers had committed a serious crime in China, they did do something good in return. They helped drive away all the Foreigner invadors who otherwise would have dismembered the land of China. They got punishment from the Hydrogen bombs which were results of the theory of Einstein's energy/mass theory. So shall we blame Einstein for the nuclear bombs or shall we praise USA for using such dirty bombs? All these are part of the history, which seems to be on the side of China which has risen to a strong economic and political entity in just 60 decades.. No other version of the history could have written that miraculous  and beautiful story for China . Don't you think that it is the so called  positive energy at play?
  • 檢舉

    Elton 2009-09-26 11:48

    I said before that positive energy is beneficial to the existence of mankind and negative energy is detrimental to the existence of mankind. You say that the soldier is killing people to protect his country. He is not producing negative energy, if his country is attacked by other country for the sake oil in his country. A policeman killing a thief who attacks him is not producing negative energy. A driver knocking down a person because of careless driving or being drunken is producing negative energy.

    Your theory that cigarettes selling can bring wealth is pessimistic, it releases negative energy because wealth comes at the expense of the health of people.

    Perhaps you may say that wars can bring wealth to those who sell coffins or to the weapon manufacturers, which is a pessimistic way of doing things. It releases negative energy, because it is detrimental to the existence of mankind.

    Do you want to smoke? I do not want to smoke.

    檢舉

    harryzheng2009-09-29 10:48

    Imagine a country invades USA for the sake of its oil and minerals, and the USA soldiers defend their countries and kill the opposite soldiers. Do you think the USA soldiersare releasing positive energy? On the surface yes. But don't forget that more than 200 years ago, their ancestors invaded the North America, and killed most of the American Indians and took the land for their own. So in the eyes of the Indians, the white men are looters, aren't they?. If you distinguish people's behaviors by simply considering whether they are negative or positive energy motivated, you are understating the things. Or that means your theory does not work. How can you defuse the tension between two rival tribes whoese hatred is deep rooted  in past history?

  • 檢舉

    Elton 2009-09-25 15:35

    Loyalty is positive. It is a good virtue. A soldier should be loyal to his or her country. But if the soldier is asked to attack another country for the sake of oil; the soldier is releasing negative energy and the country is also releasing negative energy. Then the loyalty of the soldier is blind, it is negative. When we issue negative energy, we may not be self-conscious of the release of negative energy. We produce negative energy because of the absorption of negative energy. People smoke because they have absorbed negative energy instead of the positive energy. Parents educate their children not to smoke and tell them the consequences or to stay away from people who smoke. Parents then are issuing positive energy, which hopefully can be absorbed by their children. A person quits smoking because the positive energy can overcome the negative energy in his body. A person gets sick because the positive energy in his body cannot overcome the negative energy attacking his body.

    檢舉

    harryzheng2009-09-25 18:00

    When two countries or two tribes are war, whatever the reason, their soldiers  are killing one another. They think they are releasing positive energy as they consider they are fighting for the well being of their own country fellows. Yet killing people no doubt is a sign of negative energy release. So there is a paradox. This tells that the so called positive energy  is something self professed and depends on the stance of the people .

    As for smoking, it can be a benign activities since

    1. it brings hectic tax income for the government

    2. it helps the tobacco farmers, the cigarette making companies, the shipping companies,  the wholesellers, the retailers to make a living

    3. People get sick because of smoking, this brings business to doctors, pharmacies, health food providers, and promotes economy.

    4. Smoking cuts short the life span and make people less fertile. All these help stablise if not reduce the world population, a hygiene factor in world peace.

    So smoking should be a form of positive energy and should be promoted.

    What do you think of my above argument?

     

  • 檢舉

    Elton 2009-09-24 15:13

    I cannot make you believe what I say. Because you think you can overpower the creator. We can find out many unknowns, but not the unknowns that I have mentioned. You have your freedom to search for those unknowns, but there will be no answers. If you have answers to those unknowns, I am very interested to know about them. I am always thinking of positive and negative energy. If negative energy in your body is more than the positive energy, it is very difficult for you to issue positive energy. Negative energy is not beneficial to the existence of humans and positive energy is beneficial to the existence of humans. So it is not easy for a student to be filial to his parents, to respect his teachers and to study hard, which is an emancipation of positive energy.

    檢舉

    harryzheng2009-09-25 10:54

    On the topic of positive energy, can I ask you some questions: Is loyalty a positive energy? Shall  a soldier be loyal to his/her country? Shall a citizen love his/her country?

     

  • 檢舉

    Elton 2009-09-23 11:04

    Scientific development never ends. The ancient people never thought that people could land on the moon. I think that everything is possible, including the transmission of humans by a certain form of energy. We cannot do it now, but that does mean we cannot do it in the long long future. I do not think that everything can be explained by physics. It is not so simple as that. I cannot prove to you the existence of the creator. If you know who the creator is, the creator will not be the creator and will become an ordinary person. The creator is almighty and cannot be known.

    檢舉

    harryzheng2009-09-23 15:39

    It is nice to hear that you at least agree  that human being's ability is not limited. We cannot do something today does not mean it cannot be done in future. So why you put limitation to human's future advance to reach the knowlege the origins of everything? If a Creator could interfere with or temper with physics, then physics was no longer physics, but some rules that varied according to the wish of the Creator day by day.
  • 檢舉

    Elton 2009-09-22 12:54

    I have to stress again that human is not almighty. We cannot know who the creator is, but we assume that the creator does exist to create all the things and phenomena. Human is intelligent. Humans are created by the creator. The power of humans will never exceed the ability of the creator. The creator provides perpetual unknowns for humans, which creates momentum for them to explore. I am not superstitious. Humans may, in the future, have the ability to transfer people via light energy to outer planets by decomposing their bodies and assembling them again. I still insist that those four mentioned unknowns will remain unknown by humans forever. 

    檢舉

    harryzheng2009-09-22 15:59

    When you say you "we assume" the existence of the creator, you have the obligation to prove your assumption is correct, by hook or by crook. I am sure that the Creator did not create the human beings (as there are no evidence to support it), but I am sure that human being did create the so called Creator. You mentioned 4 unknowns, but there are already explanations about these unknowns, e.g as what has been told in my blog. If you want to challenge the theories, then you need to put forward the counter evidence or another theory. Only in such scientific way can the debate be carried on constructively. While you say you are not superstitious, in fact you are as you believe in a supernatural power that can interfere with the physics . If you think that people one day can teleport themselves , then you need to study physics and not the so called positive energy . But from the pointof view of physics, human body is not a pieice of information but an assembly with life, and it therefore cannot resume the life-in-body form after teleporting.

  • 檢舉

    Elton 2009-09-21 12:22

    Dao is the creator. The creator is the greatest; we do not have the ability to know who the creator is. The creator creates everything step by step. The ability of humans is limited, so we cannot know the origin of the universe, the size of the universe, the origins of elements and who the creator is. We can trace back to many things, but the preceding four unknowns I mentioned would be ultimate. It is in vain to search for  answers of those origins.

    檢舉

    harryzheng2009-09-21 12:53

    It is not necessary to know who the creator is, if there is only one but just one creator. The question is how to justify his exsistence? Why should human with so much intelligence and technology surrender to the fate by saying that ultimate truth cannot be found without actually trying to look for it. We are making progress every year in revealing the secrets of the universe including its origin. One must be open in mind to accept new ideas and should not be obsessed with superstition and blind faith. We should be proactive and not pessimistic
  • 檢舉

    Elton 2009-09-20 11:52

    My interpretation of Dao is the law created by the creator. The creator has created many laws; violation of these laws may not be beneficial to humans. Humans need food for existence. Humans suffer, because they have consumed food not designed for by the creator or they suffer because of wars, the creator maintains that if they can live in harmony, wars can be prevented. I am not fickle; I believe that law of nature should be followed for human benefits. If we eat cooked and processed food and suffer constant stress, that is a violation to the law of nature, we will surely have to take that responsibility of falling sick.

    檢舉

    harryzheng2009-09-21 10:03

    O.K. Now I accept your intrepretation for the definition of Dao: the laws created by the Creator. That means Creator does not observe the Dao and he is outside the Dao. What other rules did he lay down other than those you mentioned about human beings? Human beings only have emerged in the recent 3 million years. There must be rules also for the epochs when there were no lives and no human beings.
  • 檢舉

    Elton 2009-09-17 11:07

    Though I do not know who the creator is, but Dao still exists. Two atoms of hydrogen plus one atom of oxygen forms water, this is Dao. The earth revolves around the Sun, this is Dao. Some food is beneficial to humans and some are not, this is Dao. Humans produce offspring by the combination of sperms and ova, this is Dao. Opposite sex attracts each other, this is Dao. Human life span is fixed by the genes, this is Dao.

    檢舉

    harryzheng2009-09-17 17:22

    I note that you always change your definition. This time you no longer say Dao is the Creator but some other laws in physics (H2O, gravitatonal law within Solar system) and empirical rules in biological science (beneign food, sexual intercourse for reproduction). If you are so fickle, there is no way to pin down what actually Dao is. That only proves you only have a very vague idea of what actually Dao is. Without a definition, all subsequent discussion on this topic will only be some speculations which in most cases are empty and not consistent. Do you agree?
  • 檢舉

    Elton 2009-09-14 12:41

    a.   Dao is the creator who creates everything.

    b.    Dao is also the universal Dao. The creator creates the universe, thus the Dao.

    c.   Humans should follow Dao for existence. Dao is also the nature in which humans live.

    I have said before that we cannot know who the creator is, we cannot know how large is the universe and the origin of the universe. We cannot know the origin of elements, thus the origin of humans.

    檢舉

    harryzheng2009-09-14 16:56

    If you say Creator is Dao and Dao must be followed. Tell me what rules are in Dao. If you do not know the Creator, then supposedly you do not know Dao. So how can we understand Dao and follow it?
  • 檢舉

    Elton 2009-09-11 12:34

    I hope you can pardon me for not being able to digest your blog, so please answer my questions briefly, and then I can communicate with you. You mean Dao is Zeroism. Zeroism can bring us a more clarity of mind. Everything starts from Zerosim. I think so, but we are not the creator, we cannot have answers for some origins. When we want to educate people, we try to use simple methods, so they can understand what we mean. We want people to enjoy more spiritual life than material life. They had better take control of themselves instead of being taken control by the environments, which have many bad temptations.

    檢舉

    harryzheng2009-09-11 15:06

    You can definitely digest my blog, you  only need  patience. I encourage all readers to do the same.

    On topics like this, I need pages and pages to explain. But for brief answers, you can check our previous discussions and you will find the answers.  Anyway, if you want me to do it again, you need to follow my way. Anwere my questions first so that I know where you are

    a. What is Dao? Define it please.

    b. What is its relationship with universe?

    c. What is its relationship with human beings ?

  • 檢舉

    Elton 2009-09-10 17:13

    You said that Dao existed before the birth of earth. Who created Dao? Ancient Chinese always said that there was the pre-universe Qi that created everything. Has Dao any connection with the pre-universe Qi? All theories are assumptions only.

    How can human justify how the universe was before the existing of earth?       

    What are your problems? Do you mean understanding the spacetime universe can solve all the problems? You always talked about Mission. What is the mission of humans? Do you mean different people have different roles? Do you mean they are fated to take that role? Who governors our fate? There were so many people who died in the earthquake. Were those people fated to die? I hope you can give me some ideas on my questions.

    檢舉

    harryzheng2009-09-10 19:31

    Before I answer you your questions, tell me what  Dao  is please. Do you think that Dao has  existed  just because of human beings ? Do you think that Dao did not exist before there was any human being.? Do you think that Dao's existence depends on human's existence? Are they so related ?

    Hints (all the above can be found from my blog, if only you had read my blog in details)

  • 檢舉

    活塞男 2009-09-09 09:46

    人生多美好,珍惜每一天。
    檢舉

    harryzheng2009-09-10 19:33

    That goes without saying. Can you add something new?

  • 檢舉

    Elton 2009-09-07 16:29

    I think Dao means nature. We are bound by the law of nature. Nature provides us food and shelter. Humans will suffer if they violate the law of nature. How heart diseases, diabetes and cancer are caused? Because people have taken the wrong food. The food contains antibiotics, hormones, chemicals, additives, preservatives and pesticides. These man-made items cause much harm to humans. Dao wants people to love and help another and not to be selfish. Some people are greedy and selfish, thus causing human problems.

    You are right that good intentions alone cannot bring solutions and we must put them into practice. What do you think of the present day students? What do you think of their behaviors? They take drugs and take no responsibilities. They have absorbed the bad energy from their family, peers and society and positive energy is insufficient. A baby starts absorbing either positive and negative the moment he is born. People learn from the environment which includes pictures, words, sounds, and people. So family education, social education and school education are very important to moral development.

    檢舉

    harryzheng2009-09-07 18:08

    Let me put you to straight thinking before you do the circular reasoning again. Please do not link Dao to Nature. In your previous statement, you equated Nature to Earth Planet plus eco-system. But Dao must have existed before the birth of Earth or your so called Nature. As long as you have defined something, you need to stick to it and do not change its meaning often.  To me Nature demands a definition much more than Earth Planet plus its eco system. Nature should refer to the spiritual universe, i.e. pre-spacetime universe era. Eternal Dao refers to Zeroism. So it is meaningless to say " to follow the Natural way". How Natural? What does the nature require human beings to do?

    I am not interested in human issues . Almost everybody knows that today's human behaviors are unheathy and unacceptable, yet eventhose who criticise do not know of the proper behaviors. Only when they understand the spacetime universe before they can know their Mission and hence their roles. This is the theme of my blog.

  • 檢舉

    Elton 2009-09-05 23:10

    I am not sure what you mean by perturbation of Dao. Many ancient Chinese scholars wanted people to follow Dao. I think that Dao brings harmony and peace to us. We want Dao because we do not want greediness, we want the natural way of living, and will follow the rule of nature to be benevolent to one another. I am not a warlike person. I will not solve problems by exterminating all humans by atomic bombs, which is a very pessimistic way of handling things. I appreciate people who are talented and capable of doing positive things to help people. I am a vegetarian, I wonder if you are also a vegetarian. I said before that positive and negative energy will certainly exist in this world, it depends on how to minimize negative energy and boost positive energy. Humans will never stop generating problems while they still exist on this earth.

    檢舉

    harryzheng2009-09-07 10:10

    I have explained in detail what Dao is in the early part of my Blog, and what the perturbation is. Please check it. I would not repeat myself. Many people talk about Dao, but they cannot define Dao, so most talkings are just emtpy and wrong.

    I understand your allegations , but there is not centre at all. Good intentions alone cannot bring solution at all. Panacea requires one  true and workable theory  and not many theories. As I said before, it is difficult to prove a theory true, but it is not so difficult to prove a theory wrong.

  • 檢舉

    Elton 2009-09-03 19:19

    Do you mean that Dao and Zeroism are very important things? I am a human, I take human issue to be the most important. Nowadays, there are many diseases that cannot be cured. Humans should concentrate their energy to find out methods to cure people of their diseases, so they can get relief from sufferings. We should aim to help people to solve their physical and mental problems. I stress that harmony and happiness for the whole world is the ultimate aim of humans. If you are good at science, you should find out methods to cure diseases such as cancer, diabetes, osteoporosis, tinnitus and many others. On the other hand, it is best if humans can find out methods to avoid global warming, floods, earthquakes and typhoons. Energy crisis and environmental problems are also major human issues. The release of toxins and chemicals into the air and sea is so significant that all humans will suffer in return. I think that people will not be interested in philosophy if they have nothing to eat and no jobs to do. Spiritual aspect is meaningful to humans only when their basic needs are satisfied.

    檢舉

    harryzheng2009-09-04 17:47

    As I said in my blog, Zeroism or the eternal Dao is assoicated with the spacetime universe and the spiritual universe. The perturbation of Dao is a problem, and it exists a priori as the problem for human beings to solve. Human problems on the other hands, if regarded as the most important issue in your context, then they could have been easily solved by wiping out all human beings or not having human beings in the first place. But does it make sense that human beings because of their own existence, generate problems that require human beings to devote all the time to tackle them?

    I know by physical cultivation, one can build an excellent health and the diseases you mentioned can be avoided. I know it is true because I am practising it.

    For  natural disasters, they cannot be totally avoided, but their intensity can definitely be reduced if we skimp on consuming resources and energy and particularly do not travel very often for pleasure.

  • 檢舉

    Elton 2009-09-02 14:36

    You say that punishment or award comes from the self-assessment of one’s own after death. How can assessment be made by a dead person? What is that Mission? What is the use for the continuous existence of the soul after death? Do you agree that a person should be punished if he has done a lot of bad things? Will the wicked person become a pig or another rich man after death? Karma, though complicated, should be a good system of monitoring human behaviors. All humans fight for justice. What will you think if your boss gives you less pay than one who is inferior to you in everything? I think that the creator has also created a fair system of punishment and reward. The creator is so powerful creating everything. I think the creator needs not to have big computers to keep records of human activities, the data of which are kept in every single brain. Your brain keeps all the records of your past performances, whether you have done good or bad. Do you believe that there is a hell (18 layers of hell) or heaven to harbor the dead souls?
    檢舉

    harryzheng2009-09-02 15:53

    I am happy that you are able to raise such questions as that means you are taking a deeper thought. The answers can be found from my blog, all you need is patience to read it in detail once.

    However, you are still embedded in tackling human issues. Human issues are not on top of the agenda. Of course human issues are important but they should not take away all the attention from the Mission: How to make the spacetime universe vanish the soonest possible so that all energies vanish, all spirits freed and get paired and vanish ? All these are necessary in order to restore the eternal Dao, Zeroism.

  • 檢舉

    Elton 2009-09-01 19:05

    I am sorry if you are misled by those terms used by me. I only apply those terms in my own idea. I do not know their true meanings in physics. How can you know that there are free spirits? I think that a soul is also some sort of energy, which is not the same as atomic energy. I do not know what kind of energy it is. You said that a person does not cultivate adequately. What do you mean by that? Do you mean the cultivation of moral or the cultivation of positive energy? Do you think this is karma that the creator favors? I think that if the bad people always do bad things without getting punished or without getting bad results, it is meaningless for the good people to live on. So the creator creates karma and constructs a picture that the bad people will finally get rewarded. I think that the creator wants creation. Creation is art. The constant creation of things and phenomena is art. Every change of form and phenomenon is art, without regard to its being positive or negative. How many actions do you perform within a day? How many changes can occur in this world in a day? If everything stops at the same time, this is an only dead world. It is no longer a world of art.

    檢舉

    harryzheng2009-09-02 10:27

    If you accept creator, you no doubt can accept free spirits. Free spirits are spiritual inhabitants in a spiritual universe.

     A soul whatever it is made up of (I say from free spirits that group together) is something belonging to the spiritual universe, it cannot be a convertible energy which is a matter in spacetime universe. So you should not consider a soul or a spirit as some sort of energy. Similarly you cannot consider a creator has any convertible energy and hence power. All energies and matters in the spacetime universe obey physics

    The punishment or award come from the self-assessment of one's own soul after one's death. If the cultivation (meaning that person did do something to move towards that Mission )justifies the continuance of the integrity of the soul, the soul will stay intact, or else it will disband or stay partially intact. There is no such Karma system which is too complicated to look after (who has such a big computer to keep records of those people's performance, bad or good deeds? Who is going to execute those punishments and those awards? Are these officials and officiers paid ?  What benefits do these officials have?)

    When you refer to bad or good behaviors, all these come from the judgement of the people. Say a filial son catches 2 fish  in snowy weather for his sick mother, this is a filial act. But in the eyes of the fish, it is a brutal act. Thus there appears to have no unanimous or objective judement. Yes, there is one, that is to be determined by whether the act is pro-mission and anti-mission.

    In fact, if you can spend a few hours in reading my blog, you have the above answers.

     

     

  • 檢舉

    Elton 2009-08-30 14:39

    I do not know what you mean by free spirits, where do these spirits come from? Humans are nurtured by Mother Nature, so nature is kind to humans. I think that everything is the form of energy body. A rock is vibrating. Water is vibrating and humans are the most complex vibrating organisms. Our body may have atoms of the ancient people, because their dead bodies decompose and the nutrients are absorbed by plants and we feed on these plants. Everything is composed of the basic unit the atom. Even the dead body has atoms with electrons moving along the nuclei, though it is dead. Elements are formed by atoms. Everything on earth is formed by the combinations of these elements. May be, more elements are to discovered in the future. I think that there are many types of cosmic energy. Spiritual energy can be stored and transmitted. Anyway, it is difficult to prove that whether the spirit will leave the dead body after death. If the spirit does leave the body, what kind of energy is it? Where will it go? Why it can leave the body and not disintegrated after death?

    檢舉

    harryzheng2009-08-31 11:39

    Free spirits refer to those untrapped spirits and mainly the temporal spirits. Free spirits as the name suggested are not energy. Free spirits are contemplating ways to salvage and liberate those trapped spirits. Souls are made up soul units which in turn are made up of cultivated free spirits. If a person does not cultivate adequately, the soul after death of the person may decide to disintegrate after a self-assessment.  All these have been detailed in my blog. All you need is to read it in detail. I note that you from time to time make use of some terms in physics suh as electromechanical waves,cosmic energy, momenta, relativity, atoms, neutrons in substantiating your claim, but you appear do not use them in the right sense making things very complicated to understand and follow.

    As you admitted that you did not know physics much, better avoid using those unnecessary terms and use other simple terms in your explanation.

    This is my advice to you

下50個

最新網誌

編輯 關閉

月曆

編輯 關閉
2010
S M T W T F S
  1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8 9 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28  

更新日期

編輯 關閉

更新日期

2010-02-10 14:17

最新回應

編輯 關閉

最新回應

檢視所有回應

我的BLOG友

編輯 關閉

我的BLOG友

統計資料

編輯 關閉

統計資料

  • 昨日人次:2
  • 累積人次:4303
  • 今日瀏覽:1
  • 累積瀏覽:5361
  • 網誌:1
  • 圖片:3
  • 回應:194

訂閱RSS摘要

編輯 關閉
 

R H
G S
B V

#