社民連3子於議事廳抗爭

I believe that the majority of HK people don't agree on what they were doing on last Wednesday when John Tsang was delivering 2009-2010 budget. Although I don't agree on their action, I understand why they use that kind of action to express their view. On the past 10 years, the pan-democcrats councillors were using a rational and peaceful way to express their view, but the government didn't listen to them, just using a pride manner to treat them, always felt that they want to anti the HK and Chinese government. That's why the 3 LSD lawmakers believe that using the old way to communicate with the government is useless. The reason that I don't agree on their behaviour is because HK is a traditional and conservative society, although we claim that Hong Kong is an international city, many people still think that we should have a harmonic society. I worry that the government and some of the columnists who like to polish the government's shoes would use this incident to "teach" the HK people that it is not suitable for HK to increase the pace of democracy.

For the people who blame the LSD lawmakers, they should understand the reasons that the LSD can get >10% voters' votes. If Hong Kong is not an unfair and unjustice society, would some of the HK people support them using aggressive ways to express their opinion to the government? Some of the people who support LSD are suffering from the unfair policies formulated by the government.

Some people said that what LSD lawmakers doing would give a bad example to the teenagers and children. How come no one complain that the TV drama would give a bad example to our children and teenagers? If the parents analyze the incident to their children, explain to them the rationale for the LSD makers using this action to express their voice, I don't think the teenagers would learn from them.

I feel disappointed on Civic Party and Democratic Party's response on this incident. When the journalists asked them whether they would agree that the 3 lawmakers should be disqualified if the same thing happens again next time, as one of the pan-democrats members who always say that they would fight for democracy for HK people, they don't even understand the true meaning of democracy. They didn't have guts to say that only voters can decide whether the 3 lawmakers should stay or leave. They didn't have courage to response this question. I really need to consider whether I will give my vote to them next time.